|
[ Home ]
[ Action Needed! ] [ Today ] [ recent /_\ + /'s ] [ Site Map ] [ q&d map ] [ Contact & Resources ]
TOP
URGENT!!!!!!!!!
Last
revised 10/13/05
The
following is an updated version of one sent out to about 50
local businesses the last half of April, 2003, as well as a number individuals
in the weeks before and after that time. It is an explanation of "the
situation":
Subject:
URGENT PUBLIC ACTION NEEDED, v.6
Please understand that the reason such an
unusual action as this is being taken is because this is a truly desperate
situation pertaining to the local area. It is being sent to you as part of the
effort to increase public awareness of a "possible" (see material for
why this is phrased in this way) situation that has "possibly"
resulted in the heavily camouflaged plight of Dave F, someone very, very dear to
me, and "possibly" some of my other friends.
The first option is that those holding
them be encouraged to release them immediately or that the community aid in
seeing that they are located and safely* released. Otherwise, public outcry is
needed to adequately push federal** officials to take IMMEDIATE action on behalf
of these possibly four people.
The public also needs to become aware of
what I, myself, have learned in the eight months that I have been trying to
resolve this. That is that the mechanisms we all thought were in place to
protect people against such horrors aren't really there or, if some are, they
don't work. Because of this situation, it becomes even easier for "people
of low integrity" to get away with this type of thing.
Of the four "possible" victims
included here, three men and one woman, one is, I assume a legal, immigrant***
who is originally from Ireland who may be enduring some particularly horrifying
atrocities in this. The other three are native born Americans whose families
have been in this country for at least a few generations. Of the three
Americans, one is a local person whose young daughter lives in the area.
These "possible" victims are
people who have possibly been taken into the forced custody of a gang of local
people, not necessarily "young hoods," and, in turn, may have been
forced into prostitution, in the case of the men, primarily gay prostitution.
But services may be to patrons of either sex and the solicitation geared to
either homosexual or heterosexual. They are most probably solicited at after
hour parties, and/or in services geared to wealthy and/or casino patrons. There
is reason to believe that they are also sexually exploited in using them to
"liven up" parties, "evenings out", cruises, etc.. It is
possible that they are often seen around marinas.
From my association with each of these
four people I would say that : All four are bright, hard-working, responsible
individuals of very high integrity. None of these people is homosexual. Prior to
this possible control, none of them were previously part of a "sex"
underworld, in fact, not even promiscuous. None of these four people were drug
users, other than possibly "social" drugs, if at all, although they
may be heavily drugged now as part of their possible current situation.
They may appear in public, particularly
for the purposes of solicitation, but also to try to curb the suspicion of
people like myself. When they do appear, there probably is most often someone
either with them or in the immediate area who is to make sure the "possible
victim" does nothing to disclose his or her possibly actual situation.
It is highly probable that these would not
be the only victims so far. The level and amount of cover-up that seem to
involve authorities and the level of fear that appears to be permeating the
community suggests that they aren't. As long as we allow all that's involved in
what may be happening here to continue, it will only expand and snare other
victims, especially with the increased demand for them created by the casinos
and other marketing venues, as well as the rewards these activities bring. And
the longer it would be allowed to continue, the more money would accumulate
through the exploitation of these victims and possibly other illicit activities.
That money, in turn, can be used to make it even more difficult to
"reach" these victims, and allow the people exploiting them to expand
their operations, increase the demand for more victims and pay for additional
cover-up.
Members of our community need to try to
understand the role they may be inadvertently playing in the dynamics that
allows such horror to develop, in the first place, right under our noses, and
that allows it to continue and grow:
- In not wanting to "air dirty
laundry" > >
- The perpetrators of this situation
are hometown people with whom we've worked, socialized, talked at our
business, or possibly associated some other way. From an email I sent
02/15/03 - Avoiding the Clutches of Small Favors [modified] :
The dynamics of a situation
we quite possibly have here is not that of a "mob" that
moved in from some big city somewhere. Rather, it is an inside job.
The players may primarily be people with whom many of us have been
acquainted for a long time, perhaps even from high school, perhaps
even considered friends, whose integrity, yes, adherence to moral and
ethical principles, may just be considerably less than that for which
we'd always given them credit ( no, I'm not saying that any of us are
perfect! ) And in joining together, sparked by and eventually addicted
to more money than they ever dreamed they would have, fueled by a
rapidly growing combined markets demand, they went the route of many a
small gang: they got into things they never would have thought to do
before and never would have had the wherewithal to do individually.
- In being silent > >
- The perpetrators are taunting me
with "Go ahead. Call in the FBI. No one's going to talk. No one's
going to tell them anything. They won't find out a thing!" Those
who know ANYTHING about these activities need to talk about them, and
those who don't know anything about these activities should become aware
of them. Keep in mind that those aware of these activities may have been
led to believe that the people engaging in these activities are all
doing so of their own free will.
- In "going along with things"
> >
- Members of the community need to
question why they are being asked to do a "favor" for someone,
or being just simply told to do something, along the lines of "just
do it." They need to be aware that, especially now, even the
slightest "quirky" thing that someone asks or tells them to do
may be tied to something very sinister. The situation that is the focus
of this communication developed to its current horror because people
"went along" with the perpetrators, most probably often not
having any idea what was behind that with which they were participating.
Most likely, many of these people were then possibly
"blackmailed" into continuing to go along with things by
having already implicated themselves. Their initial involvement may have
been possibly through something even so innocent as being encouraged to
do something that they would ordinarily, from time to time, have reason
to do in the course of carrying out their legitimate business.
In the course of trying to learn what may
be going on, hopefully, people may also, as I did, come to the the realization
that there are members of the community who are probably frightened, who may be
afraid to talk about certain things, afraid to admit that they've seen, heard,
read or thought certain things. Most important, who may be afraid not to do what
certain people tell them they must do. Hopefully, they will also realize what
effect all this would be having on the possible fate of my friends and other
possible current and future victims. They will most probably see that our
community is, basically, possibly being terrorized by a "gang" of
people doing very, very bad things to other people and, most possibly, coercing
others to go along with those activities because those other people may feel
that, unless they go along with this "gang", that gang will retaliate
by doing the same bad things to them or a loved one of theirs.
Members of the public need to realize
that, unless they help in this, there may eventually come a time when they,
themselves, "decipher" that their niece or nephew, or son or daughter,
or fiancé or spouse - someone very, very dear to them . . . just as in the
situation here - has also now become a victim of something like this, and even
perhaps now with whom they are not able to associate nor even see, as is this
case with me and at least one of the other "possible" victim's loved
one, while knowing, or worse, not knowing what danger that person is in nor how
much they may be suffering. There may possibly come a time when they may be
deciphering many others who have possibly fallen victim to similar situations.
But they will have no way to bring any of those victims to safety and
"actual" freedom because there are no effective mechanisms in place to
do so and there may be so much money and power, building as we speak, supporting
these activities.
There is no more time for either "lip
service," excuses nor cover-up activities by authorities. The proof's in
the PUDDING!! These people are still being held against their will, forcefully
prostituted, technically serving as slaves, possibly additionally tortured and
enduring additional inhumane conditions, and being terrorized into doing and
saying things to help mask their own horrible situation.
Believe it or not, "authorities"
may use the situation they've created because they haven't done anything to help
in this and, rather, have done so much that actually helps cover it up and
protects the perpetrators, as a reason for not doing anything now, that locate
and rescue attempt and/or investigation is not a priority because the situation
"has gone on for so long".
These are people's lives! Almost nine
months have gone by since David was wrenched involuntarily from my life and has
been living in utter horror! An email sent out 02/1/03 - I'm a lunatic**** may
help in quelling any doubts you may have in believing all of this.
Please help in making the public aware of
this situation, and in pressuring officials to take action. If you are willing
to do so, and especially if you are willing to do even more to favorably resolve
this situation, I thank you.
Sincerely,
Marianne
LaBrecque
Waterford,
CT
* There is a chance that there have been
bogus "releases" of at least one of these victims so far, in which he
has been released to someone who just returned him to those holding and
exploiting him. Each of these victims know what I am doing here. To avoid the
possibility of a bogus release, I need to be involved in authenticating the
validity of their release. This needs to be done in person, especially since, in
the past few weeks, there have been attempts made and one actual instance of
personal belongings taken from me that could be used to facilitate a "bogus
release".
** Because the crimes possibly being
committed here are felonies, it is not appropriate for local police to be the
ones responsible for this investigation. In addition, the nature and required
scope of operations of what is possibly occurring here suggests that local
police and officials may have, perhaps inadvertently, possibly somehow
unfavorably implicated themselves in this somewhere along the line. Even if this
were not the case, the possibility itself would seem to create too much of a
"conflict of interest" issue for them to be responsible for an
investigation that, in the course of being conducted, may reveal whether or not
they have. There are also indications that the local regional FBI office in New
Haven should not be used for this matter.
*** In a 3/28/03 article in the New London
Day Crackdown on sex trafficking urged, which spoke only of female victims from
other countries, the Day writer used some information he received, he told me,
from Leslie Wolfe, president of the Center for Women Policy Studies in
Washington, D.C.:
"[A] 2000 federal law protects
trafficking victims from prosecution and declares that they may be treated as
refugees. They may receive non-immigrant "T visas," which allow them
to stay in the U.S. for three years and apply for permanent resident status, but
the federal Immigration and Naturalization Service has awarded only 23 T visas
to date" [emphasis is mine]
**** Many of these emails are available
for reading at mykindredspirit.home.att.net/emails.htm.
It is part of the web site, mykindredspirit.home.att.net,
that was set up on April 29th to help disseminate this information and to help
overcome effects of the fear gripping our community that hampers efforts to
rescue these victims. All emails referenced in this communication, above and
that below, are on that web site.
More Information regarding this ,
much of it taken from the email 04/27/03 - Dysfunctional Infrastructure, part 1
or from above: Members of the community are being asked to disseminate any of
the information they may have regarding this situation. >From my perspective,
I think that some of the most important information is probably the things that
follow here: Can't Be Stressed Enough, Previous Attempts to Work
Within the Infrastructure and Obstacles to "Reaching" Him and
Possibly the Other Possible Victims:
Can't Be
Stressed Enough > > >
This account needs
to be prefaced with some points made before:
From
02/1/03 - I'm a lunatic :
From
that written above:
-
"There
is a chance that there have been bogus "releases" of at least
one of these victims so far, in which he has been released to someone who
just returned him to those holding and exploiting him. Each of these
victims know what I am doing here. To avoid the possibility of a bogus
release, I need to be involved in authenticating the validity of their
release. This needs to be done in person, especially since, in the past
few weeks, there have been attempts made and one actual instance of
personal belongings taken from me that could be used to facilitate a
"bogus release".
-
"Because
the crimes possibly being committed here are felonies, it is not
appropriate for local police to be the ones responsible for this
investigation. In addition, the nature and required scope of operations of
what is possibly occurring here suggests that local police and officials
may have, perhaps inadvertently, possibly somehow unfavorably implicated
themselves in this somewhere along the line. Even if this were not the
case, the possibility itself would seem to create too much of a
"conflict of interest" issue for them to be responsible for an
investigation that, in the course of being conducted, may reveal whether
or not they have. There are also indications that the local regional FBI
office in New Haven should not be used for this matter. "
From
04/27/03 - April 27th :
-
clarification:
local police involvement > >
No,
they shouldn't be responsible for the investigation into charges. But they
most definitely should probably be involved in locating and reaching
victims and apprehending the perpetrators, in other words, stopping crimes
in progress. They are much closer to that, have more information, than
authorities farther removed would have. No, for now, they shouldn't be
involved in the questioning of these victims - they've already made
themselves dysfunctional in that area, as well. And they should never
again have contact with MKS without either alerting me about it, possibly
even having me be there. F____ PROTOCOL ! ! ! ! ! And forget reason to
enter, apprehend, etc., etc.. People are in serious danger, these are
their lives!! These "authorities" are soooo selective in which
rules they bend!"
From
04/10/03 - Terrified!:
-
"Again,
this is not any reflection at all on his character, which is actually
exceptionally staunch. But what he has had to endure is also exceptionally
horrifying. . . . . . . All this effects his cooperation, i.e., the part
he can do himself, in getting out of this situation. He most likely will
not speak up himself unless he feels it is 100% safe for him to do so. "
And
04/11/03 - more on terrified > the extreme mental anguish :
-
"He
will be too terrified to talk truthfully even with people he trusts, if
there are people there he doesn't trust. These people he doesn't trust may
be people who are actually on his side, but, if he doesn't perceive them
as such, it doesn't matter. He will still be too terrified to talk
truthfully in front of them. Of the four people with whom I've spoke who
are either in a similar situation, or at least "under control,"
his has been the most extreme fear of talking, although we have been able
to communicate otherwise.. . . . . I am so afraid of the state of his mind
right now. I am so afraid that it will snap and get locked into always
thinking that he is in the situation he is now, so that, even once he is
set free, he will never know it."
The
Coast Guard may also have to get involved in this.
Also
see: FBI on slavery: www.fbi.gov/hq/cid/civilrights/slavery.htm,
be sure to read the text at the bottom of these pages. The web page design
makes it easy to overlook.
FBI
on Color of Law www.fbi.gov/hq/cid/civilrights/color.htm,
for example, failing to protect these victims, in failing to provide
protection to me upon my release the night of my arrest after I told them that
I had been threatened during the stand-off and after the spg member who were
there realized that I had called the police. More, of course, but anyone who's
familiar with the material on the linked sight here could probably identify
QUITE a number of other possibilities. I'm not talking law suit. This is
merely an enforcement agency doing it's job.
Previous
Attempts to Work Within the Infrastructure:
NOTE: This is not the extent of
infrastructure involvement, but no more detail
will be disclosed here, for now.
On 8/16/02,
the night of my arrest relating to this situation,
I called in two 911 calls of a "possible mob
fight" when two spg members rushed at me as I
awaited "reinforcements" to arrive to
help get Dave safely out of there and away from
the spg. Both Stonington and Groton
Police arrived at the scene. The arresting
officer was Stonington Patrolman James
Colandrea, but, although I may have heard that
he supposedly was not scheduled for duty that
night, Stonington Lieutenant Raymond Curioso
appeared at the scene as well. ( I had both
of them give me their names and I wrote them down
at that time.) I have heard
eyewitnesses give an account of these activities
that took place on the street that night in front
of the eastern cafe - now if they would only be
willing/not be afraid to talk again!
In my
attempts to get a copy of the police log for that
day, which I finally did get, I was told by that
department that Lieutenant Curioso is also in
charge of police department records.
Throughout this ordeal, I was requesting an
investigation into Dave's situation.
After
postponing my scheduled court session for that
day, on 8/26 I called to make an appointment to
meet with Stonington Police Captain Jerry
Desmond. ( Administrative Office: 599-7510,
Routine calls: 599-4411) At that
meeting, I again requested an investigation.
When I met with the captain, Stonington Police
Sergeant Beebe also sat in on the meeting,
although, at one point, despite that I'd requested
confidentiality, a number of other officers also
came into the office. It was probably when Stonington
Lieutenant James(?) Stewart came into the
office. Desmond left the office and I
started to be peppered with questions from a
number of individuals. They asked if I would
voluntarily submit to a psychological evaluation
and I told them that I would - and did - if that
was what it was going to take for them to
investigate Dave's situation.
I continued
following up with the Stonington Police, working
through Lieutenant Stewart. He really wasn't
giving it much priority until, on 9/2, when I
finally said to him in a phone conversation, and
as said in 2/1/03 email I'm a
lunatic , "Even if you think I'm a raving
lunatic, what may be happening is serious and
dangerous enough that, even if there is only a 1%
chance that it is, you should be looking into it.
[ He said he was going to work with Groton police
to try to see if Dave could be located, and get
back to me.] So, after spending a few days
realizing that they, also, could not locate him,
by the end of the week they "somehow"
were able to see him and ask him if he was okay,
or, at least, that was the story that went around
the stations."
On Sunday,
9/15, I got a call from Groton Police Officer
Kemple. One of the things he told me was
that [ Sugar Daddy ] gave him copies of a number
of my emails.
Waterford
Police had been alerted by me from the morning
after my arrest when I called them to request
extra patrolling on the street. There were
numerous interactions with them regarding this
situation after that.
9/6/02:
FBI : see 3/6's OK. I Get it. Part 2
9/9 -
10/21/02: State's Attorney's Office G.A. #10,
Prosecutor Office, New London County Court House
10/29/02:
8 page fax, including fax cover, 11/12/02
telephone conversation with Peter Dibble, First
Selectman, Stonington ( "I don't
know anything about it and I don't WANT to know
anything about it! ) regarding police issues
relating to Dave's situation ( see 2/1's I'm a
lunatic and 3/6's OK. I Get it. Part 2)
3/25/03: Irish
Embassy : see 4/19 Family
Additional
appeals:
That even if they were to decide to investigate,
it would probably not be given high priority
because it has gone on so long is what was told to
me on 3/31 by Maria Kahn, Federal Prosecutor,
in US Attorney, Kevin O'Connor's office. She
is the person who directed that the form be sent
to me that was then lost twice in the mail.
(ref: 4/13's Bureaucracy & Investigation
and 4/21's Crossing the borderline )
I had been directed to her when I called to speak
personally with US Attorney, Connecticut
District, Kevin O'Connor on 3/31/03.
I had been
directed to do so by State Representative
Andrea Stillman - Democrat, 38th Assembly
District, Waterford and Montville. She
is the one featured in the article Crackdown on
Sex Trafficking Urged , New London Day, March
28, 2003. I spoke with her about Dave's
situation at length on 3/31 when she was in
Florida visiting her mother. Since then,
three of these emails have been sent to her, the
first two with personalized updates of the
situation. I have not received any
acknowledgments from her office. Andrea
Stillman <andrea.stillman@po.state.ct.us>
In the District: 5 Coolidge Court,
Waterford, CT 06385, (860) 443-8568
At the Capitol: Legislative Office Building, Room
3703, Hartford, CT 06106-1591, (860)
240-0460, 1-800-842-1902
On 4/14/03,
I sent an email* to the office of CT Attorney
General Richard Blumenthal. In the
follow-up phone call that same day, I was told by Kevin
Mullan, Asst. Attorney General (CT) that that
office, i.e., the Ct Attorney General's office,
doesn't "get involved with that type of
thing." ( He also wouldn't tell me his
hometown when I asked him.) attorney.general@po.state.ct.us
Attorney General, Richard
Blumenthal U.S. Mail: P.O. Box 120,
Hartford, Connecticut 06141-0120 Fax:
860-808-5387 Telephone:
860-808-5318
I sent the
same email* to US Congressman, Rob Simmons,
Second District, Connecticut via his web site,
www.house.gov/simmons
and an acknowledgment email was received.
His email goes to DC, so I called there
(202-225-2076) and was directed to Legislative
Clerk, Lee Hightower. We spoke at length,
also, and I was stressing the sensitivity of the
situation (which, by the way, may not be as much
of a concern now) and she was going to talk with a
Constituent Services Representative in the Norwich
Office for guidance on how to handle this.
Someone was to get back to me within a day but no
one did. When I called the Norwich Office
(886-0139) this morning to leave a message - I
knew it's closed on Saturdays - I learned that the
Rep with whom she'd hope to consult is not listed
in the automated phone directory. I've left
a message for District Director Jane Dofina
[Dauphinais] (886-0139, ext. 12) to return
my call personally.
"Representative Rob Simmons"
<ct02ima.pub@mail.house.gov>
Congressman Rob Simmons 2 Courthouse
Square 5th Floor Norwich,
CT 06360 Phone: (860)
886-0139 Fax: (860) 886-2974
Washington, D.C.
Office: Congressman Rob
Simmons 215 Cannon House Office
Building Washington, DC
20515 202-225-2076
Obstacles
to "Reaching" Him and Possibly the Other Possible Victims:
(
Much of what was outlined in 12/12/02 - What We're Up Against:)
Even
if he's okay and still in the area:
-
We
have no way of communicating with each other. . . .
-
No
one has been willing to openly try to facilitate communication between us,
and, quite truthfully, we've avoided this in the past because of bogus
messages that were sent between us, as well as lies we were told about each
other - probably some of the things that made our trust and faith in each
other even stronger, knowing that that was all we had to go on in these
situations.
-
Communication
with and among other members of the community also appears to be heavily
restricted due to the possible terrorized state of our locale.
-
I
do not know where he is "living"/being kept, if it's the same each
night/day.....
-
I
don't know what vehicle he is driving, nor if he is finally, even driving at
all. Although his van still, last I knew, appears at the boatyard, plates
removed, I don't know if he has access to it's use. It was evidently
drivable up to the time of his abduction, but others may have used it after
that point. And I was never able to safely contact him even there via phone
nor even notes, nor he to call or visit me - part of the harassment, threats
and fear that began as soon as our friendship began last Spring. He's never
been to my house and still may not know how to find it.
-
I
also don't know his work places nor times/schedule even if he is working at
his legitimate trade, as well, and have been now been forbidden to visit one
probable site on the threat of arrest.
-
I
have been forbidden by the owners to enter the two establishments where he
has been reported to have been seen more often.
NOTE: I was banded from
two more establishments, on 5/13/03 and
5/17/03. In both cases, it was openly
admitted to me, at least in so many words,
that it was through the "request" of
one of the gang members, the same gang member
for each of these establishments. [Added
05/2004: I've since been banned from two
additional establishments, bringing the total
to six establishments of this tiny area.
One of these "banishments" has been
reversed and appears to have been done by
someone posing as someone else. However,
it is in a part of town into which it may be
riskier for me to venture.]
-
My
appearance at one of the after hour parties is not an option.
-
As
an example of how still uncomprehending the police are, I was asked where
Dave gets his mail!
-
These
victims are being drugged in a way that would make them extremely docile and
"cooperative." NOTE: Eventually, the behavior observed
of victims, as well as others being coerced by
this gang, led to the belief that truth serum
is often used for interrogation, direct
control and to aid in transporting of victims.
Some
of the additional conditions preventing Dave and
other victims from escaping:
-
They
are prevented from having money that may help them escape.
-
Most
likely that any evidence of their personal identification has been taken
from them.
-
As
outlined in 4/10's Terrified! and 4/11's more on terrified > the extreme
mental anguish: What he has endured is so horrifying that it effects his
cooperation, i.e., the part he can do himself, in getting out of this
situation. He most likely will not speak up himself unless he feels it is
100% safe for him to do so. He will be too terrified to talk truthfully even
with people he trusts, if there are people there he doesn't trust. These
people he doesn't trust may be people who are actually on his side, but, if
he doesn't perceive them as such, it doesn't matter. He will still be too
terrified to talk truthfully in front of them. The other victims may now be
just as terrified.
-
From
the letter faxed to a selectman on 10/29/02: ". . . members of the
police department engaged in behavior that would actually prevent a victim
from trusting them enough to seek their assistance. It would also tend to
frighten or discourage community members from trying to come to any victim's
aid. Some of it also prevents or drastically reduces the chance of any
future help reaching the possible victim."
-
After
my experiences with the infrastructure, I have the same fears/distrust.
-
The
people "possibly" holding him are possibly now increasing their
masking of his actual situation by having him on a more "routine"
schedule - although not anywhere in a way in which he and I may easily come
in contact with each other. He would possibly be "cooperating in
exchange" for not being subjected to harsher/more inhumane treatment.
From 05/01/03 - What's HIS frustration level? [modified] :
"Yes,
he must have been "broken in" i.e., through the horror he's
been undergoing, they've finally "convinced" him that he
better just cooperate with them, in fact enough so that there doesn't even
have to be a guard on him all the time, particularly in the sightings they
realize they have to allow to counteract the reaction to the BIG STINK 'that
crazy person" is making. (BTW - what if the authorities sent undercover
agents in and the only thing they heard about Dave is what they've heard
I've been saying and that, perhaps that person doesn't know me or hasn't
been around me enough to say, but that people who DO know me say that I'm
crazy, in fact they tell me to my face in front of other people! This is
just yet another way that people "going along with things"
jeopardizes the welfare of these victims. ) "
AGAIN> > > ANYONE RECEIVING
THREATS, WHETHER FROM THE SPG OR ANYONE ELSE, SHOULD TELL OTHERS AND/OR REPORT
IT IMMEDIATELY!!!
Click
to return to top of page
Click
to return to Home page
Click
to go to the next email sent that appears on this site
Click
to go to the previous email sent that appears on this site
[ Home ]
[ Action Needed! ] [ Today ] [ recent /_\ + /'s ] [ Site Map ] [ q&d map ] [ Contact & Resources ]
Last
revised 10/13/05
|