[ Dispelling Myths ] [ shenanigans ]
TOP
Evidence of Possible Infrastructure Involvement 
Last revised 12/07/05

reports submitted relating to this
possible incidents/evidence

WORK ON THIS PAGE IS STILL IN PROGRESS

reports submitted relating to this

• 06/15/03 request by U.S. DOJ/CRD for possible evidence of infrastructure involvement
  Addendum - Evidence of Possible Infrastructure Involvement.doc was prepared in response made to me, on 06/15/03, by a staff member of the U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division.  The conversation was in relation to the investigation request I was filing with that office, draft version of which was faxed to them on 06/13/03, completed version earlier in the day of this conversation.   This Addendum was sent to DOJ/CRD on 07/03/03.
  

  • Note that I was again falsely arrested within hours after receiving that call and the request for this Addendum was received by me.
    

  • Content

    • Preceding the POSSIBLE EVIDENCE OF INFRASTRUCTURE INVOLVEMENT was the following:
      

      • PREFACE
        • LOCAL CULTURE AND ENVIRONMENT

        • RECENT FINDINGS RELATING TO POSSIBLE INFRASTRUCTURE INVOLVEMENT

          • Possible Infiltration

          • Office Practices and Procedures

        • REASON GANG WOULD ALSO NOT WANT INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTIGATED
          

  • Some of the authorities who have been sent this addendum:

    • 07/03/03 faxed to DOJ/CRD at 5:20 pm
      

see excerpts from  Addendum - Evidence of Possible Infrastructure Involvement.doc

possible incidents/evidence

• 09/06/02 SPD records request for investigation of a "possible" human trafficking situation and investigation as SLANDER

  • 09/06/02 SPD Incident #2002000013717 (notated copy)

  • 09/06/02 SPD trafficking inquest
    
    

• 09/06/02 FBI New Haven records request for investigation of possible trafficking situation as a false arrest claim
  
  

• 05/13/03 SPD faxes falsified record to FBI NH
  
  

• 05/13/03 SPD unsubstantiated claim
  

• 06/16/03 - 06/17/03 happenstance related to the 06/16/03 SPD false arrest disrupted my work even more than it ordinarily would have
  
  

• 06/17/03 " possible drugging" of me
  extracted from 09/30/03 - Beaming up the infrastructure
  

  • 6/18/03, two days after my 6/16/03 arrest
    

    • Stephanie had been in that night at Daniel Packer Inne
      

    • At approx. 1:10 a.m. June 18, 2003, I called alert to Groton Police that I was experiencing symptoms of having been drugged, that I couldn't drive any further and that I was in my car at Bank Square in Mystic.  Officer Lambert woke me up the next morning at 5:30 am on Bank Square, where I'd fallen asleep/passed out in my car. I'd explained to Lambert, "No, not drunk. Definitely drugged." and described the symptoms to him.
      
      
      

• 06/18/03 calls and reports to GPD regarding "possible drugging" not recorded
  

  • 06/18/03 call I made to the front desk, 441-6712, at approx. 1:10 a.m. June 18, 2003 to alert Groton Police that I was experiencing symptoms of having been drugged, that I couldn't drive any further and that I was in my car at Bank Square in Mystic. Officer Smith took that call but I was told by the desk office later that day that there was no record of that call. The second item actually involves 2 calls. The first was a call made at 1:21 am, with an 18 minute duration. The second was at 1:45 am, of less than a one minute duration. I believe the second was a quick call back to make sure that the first call was being recorded.
    

  • 06/18/03 any report done by Officer Lambert when after he found me in my car at that same place approximately 5:30 a.m. that same morning
    
    
    

• 07/02/03 GPD Detective Gibson called me because he wanted me to go in to see him so that he could "talk to me" because I'd said that I'd been drugged.
  

  • Gibson said he doesn't know anything else about any of the rest of this case, including whether or not my call that night had been recorded and, if not, why. He kept saying, "I don't know anything about any of that." He said that he was just calling because I was making a serious claim, that I'd been drugged, and that he wants to talk to me about that.
    

  • I openly told him that, unless he was looking into the rest, I probably was not going to be able to get time to go in there and meet with him. That, as far as I was concerned, the incident was only important as part of a pattern, other than possibly also trying to identify what drugs this gang may be using, that it was only important in the context of Dave's situation. 
    

  • I gave him the web site address, told him that he may get some information from [__________], and probably told him that GPD should have records of a number of incidents since last August that relate to this. I may have given exact dates, but I haven't taken the time to meet with him nor call him.
    

  • Because of different things included above, I think that there is a good chance that that call was directed by the gang
    

  • That may have meant that there must be some record somewhere of the 6/18/03 calls, unless Gibson was only using what was [verbally] reported to [him by] Groton Police Officer Lambert, although I believe Gibson told me that he didn't know anything about that either
    

    • repeated requests for these records indicate that, based on what GPD has maintained in its response to those requests, these records do not exist
      

  • Indications here point to the fact that GPD was very much aware of the "possible" drugging incident and willfully omitted its report from GPD records and, in doing so, any other infrastructure reports which those records feed
    
    
    
    

• 09/06/03 NLPD hesitant of recording incident of rock thrown at car being driven, based on estimated book value of vehicle
  

  • 09/05/03 rock thrown at my car, as I'm driving

    • approx 6 hrs after faxing "conspiracy against rights" package to FBI New Haven

    • rock thrown at car, report to police

      • 09/06/03 NLPD did not want to record incident, based on estimated damage to my 1988 vehicle which had little or no book value
        
        
        

• Rioux, Lt. Wayne I., Commanding Officer, CT Dept. of Public Safety Communications Center/Missing Person Unit,
  

  • no protocol in place, limited jurisdiction, ref: 09/08/03 - Just how ill-prepared
    
    
    

• 09/16/03 series of incidents begin with gunshot near the end of my street
  
  

  • 09/16/03 gunshot heard near end of street, description of incident:

    • 09/17/03 - Why all the profanity: [modified]

      • 09/17/03 - those who have loved ones who have been taken [modified]
        
        

  • 09/16/03 called the Waterford Police non-emergency number to report possible gunshot

    • no police car came down the street

    • in checking with Joe Depasquale later, I learn that the call had never been recorded and that he had never been alerted, although, he said, he is supposed to be alerted to anything like that

      • regarding additional information related to this infrastructure component, note the case to which it was later revealed it was related:

        • incident involving the abuse of Waterford Police dispatch communication system by dispatch personnel
          
          

  • incidents later that night of 09/16/03

    • Ren: "Dave's leaving the area tomorrow"

    • "Evidence! Evidence!"

      • regarding "watch"

        • One of Bob Heively's favorite expressions was/is, "He better watch out.  I know where he lives."

        • On 01(or 02/)  /  03, I was publicly warned that I was going to be placed "on watch" by the spg/"powers that be", and I soon was (ref: S)

    • regarding sex trafficking involving young children
      
      
      

• 10/23/03 false information entered into Town of Groton Police Department records

  • GPD 10/23/03 arrest report for case#2003-25616 

    • in addition to false claims of statements by me recorded in GPD 10/23/03 arrest report, possibly false claims of statements by other people, as well, the report states that "LaBrecque has had previous encounters with this P.D. as well as neighboring police departments."

      • records of my "previous encounters" with GPD reported in GPD Rpt for 10/23/03 Case# 2003-23616 were requested from GPD

        • verbal (and possibly written) response received from Sgt. Steven C. Smith, GPD Records Supervisor, was that there were none
          
          
          

• 08/09/04 WPD submits a false statement against me to the local hospital

 

 

 

Also see Documentation/Key Events and threat messages/terrorist tactics pages

 

excerpts from Addendum - Evidence of Possible Infrastructure Involvement.doc

 

U.S. POST OFFICE

3/31/03 - 4/14/03 Mail from U.S. Attorney's Office "Lost in Mail"

US Attorney's Office in New Haven requires that complaints be submitted on a form that can be acquired only through the mail or by going to that office. At the time of this writing, they will not fax nor email the forms and they are not available from their internet site.

The first time the form, with it envelope clearly indicating that it was from the U.S. Department of Justice, United State Attorney, District of Connecticut in New Haven, CT, was sent to me from that office on 3/31/03 it was not received. The second time it was sent to me via registered mail on 4/8/03 it was also not received. After I was told by the US Attorney's Office in New Haven that they'd sent the form to me again via registered mail, I started checking with the local post office to see if it had possibly been received but that I just hadn't been notified. On Monday, 4/14/03, I called the post office to again check.

When I learned that it still hadn't been found, I asked to speak to the Postmaster and alerted him to the fact that two items in a row from the US Attorney's Office in New Haven had been lost in the mail and that he should possibly want to be aware of that.

At the same time, the US Attorney's Office in New Haven was sending the form out to me again, this time as certified mail. That one was received. When I went into the post office to pick it up, I asked to see the Postmaster. He had someone else sit in on the meeting, as well. I'd brought a brochure that I had been circulating of this situation of Dave and possible three other of my friends and told them that the mail I'd been looking for had been related to that situation. I responded to their questions, and eventually they heard the whole story. It included the problems I was having in my attempts to get it investigated. It also included the dynamics behind the situation, particularly people just "going along" with the gang but not knowing why they were being asked to do that "one small favor."

I alerted them to the fact that there was a possibility that someone in that post office was "going along" with this and that that may have been why those forms had been lost.

From an email:

There must be some pretty big stuff needing cover-up if all this is being done to prevent investigations.

There may have been an incident last summer in which a fellow patron of John's Café was bringing to my attention that Laura Joyner, who was bartending at the time, was saying that anything to and from possibly this agency as well as possibly others was getting "lost in the mail" and that the only way anyone could get anything from or to the U.S. Attorney's Office is to drive to New Haven. This was prior to Dave's abduction and, at the time, I did not understand the implications.

WORK ON THIS PAGE IS STILL IN PROGRESS

Click to return to top of page

 

[ Home ]

[ Action Needed! ] [ Today ] [ recent /_\ + /'s ] [ Site Map ] [ q&d site navi ] [ Contact ]