|
03/12/05 So much to relay - I've fallen so far behind!
Yes, some of this was what was originally
a part of no pussyfooting!, the email-in-progress for about, at least, a month
now - and I can't even take the time to provide a more accurate date[*]! Well,
that's okay, because, otherwise, by now that email would be too long for anyone
to read, anyway. But which also means that some of what is being relayed in
these emails is not being sent out in chronological order.
written approx (see [*] above):
What with trying to deal with all that
is going on right now, it's been too busy, so much added to what already was
being done:
- L&M (written acknowledgement of
receipt received)
- Tobin (no acknowledgement, despite
that written follow-up requests and calls to that office to confirm
receipt of faxes & emails.*)
- DSS Norwich (No acknowledgement,
which now seems to be standard office procedures for government offices
these days, to a certain extent, despite follow-up calls, not even
counting the ones to 800# to this office that weren't answered, despite
attempts made during business hours. As long as we pay the considerable
amount of taxes that we do to support these "operations" and see
a building and perhaps, even if it is sometimes difficult to do, people
who receive a paycheck issued by that entity for the work they are
supposed to be doing, we assume we've completed our public scrutiny of
government spending and efficiency relating to that component.)
That above has some additional updates,
including * above, that I can't take the time to look up and include now. And so
much more added now, that ... too little time/energy. These recent press
releases will have to suffice:
Not sure if these went out before in these
emails, but being added just-in-case:
So, now, results of yesterday's court
session, 03/11/05, in which I, very much apparently, was scheduled to be carted
off to somewhere for at least 60 days [don't know how many receiving this are
aware of frantic appeals made between late Thursday afternoon, 03/10/05, and
point about to be relayed.] Yesterday, mid-afternoon, judge states:
-
It
would be unfair to incarcerate me for sixty days with such little time
allowed for me to arrange things ( "Do you have any animals, any
children? Is there someone who can take care of your house?" etc..)
emphatically stating that, based on OCE report, that was exactly what she'd
intended/intends to do
-
I
immediately stated that I was contesting the OCE evaluation (copy of report,
with my notations: mykindredspirit2.home.att.net/030905_OCE_report.htm)
-
She
assigned the SPD (hand-picked for me by the court - I was not permitted any
input in selection - and who has been under contract by the court to do
work, such as this, for some time now) previously assigned as "stand-by
counsel" [CT General Statutes (CGS) Sec. 44-5] to represent me in the
contesting of the OCE evaluation/Competency to Stand Trial, not the criminal
charges trial, which now are considered a separate [issue/trial?]. She said
that she felt that it is in my own best interest for this to be done, and
also may have (????) given additional reason(s)
-
Time
is given to 4/05/05 to prepare for contesting of the OCE
evaluation/Competency to Stand Trial. The hearing will be a 2 pm Eastern
Time.
-
I
am to make any preparations I need to make to prepare to be incarcerated on
4/05/05 for (at least) 60 days
-
"Plan/agreement"
will also be entertained by the judge, in lieu of mandatory detainment
-
(??)
interim court sessions may be allowed, as possibly needed
[There
may be more, but I need to take a nap.]
Okay, yeah: SPD and I are to prepare a
plan, and, as a result, we agreed to communicate, regarding this, over this
weekend (at this point, in this communication, can only rely on c&p >
what went out through the course of the day [yes, input/additional help is
needed/would be very much appreciated]):
As far as a plan/agreement, based on
what I recall the judge saying, in addition to what I think she has in mind, I
think we agree that it is something that would be an alternate to the 60 days
"inpatient hospitalization." I don't think she's referring to me
having a plan in place, should I be committed to inpatient hospitalization.
Until and unless we effectively contest
the report/evaluation, I would think [the plan/agreement we prepare] should be
something that the judge believes addresses the concerns of OCE. Brushing
aside some of the other miscellaneous "irregularities" of this
report for a minute, what that is is stated in its Conclusion, p6 of report:
the committee says I "demonstrated what appeared to be a complex
delusional system regarding 'organized crime, modern-day slavery, human
trafficking and abductions ... Her preoccupation with modern-day slavery and
the abduction of her fiancé, and her propensity to focus on these issues in a
tangential, circumstantial manner, impairs her capacity ..." etc.
So I would think that the plan has to
address what the committee expects to be accomplished, in regard to that
stated in their conclusions, by the inpatient hospitalization it states I
need. The question must be asked, "What does the committee expect to be
accomplished, in regard to this?" The only possible answer could be that
they would attempt to halt my current activities, although they would probably
word it something like "addressing her complex delusional and persecutory
condition." But, pressing them further, it seems that they would have to
admit that they are, in fact, attempting to halt my anti-slavery activity. And
what they are prescribing probably would, since I would not be permitted to
work, if an inpatient, and my agreeing to not continue the efforts, if/when
released, would probably be made a condition for release. In addition, based
on my experience through the Pond House incident, I would be routinely
questioned on my beliefs relating to this, in assessing my
"suitability" for release, [and that would be used as] a basis for
continued detainment. And, inpatient or out, there is probably also a hope
that I may be "medicated" in a way that would inhibit my functioning
in these thoughts/activites - so probably a number of others, as well.
Some of these things are addressed in
what I said in a press release that went out a few days before I met with OCE:
02/17/2005 Court Orders Competence to Stand Trial Evaluation of Anti
Modern-day Slavery Advocate www.emediawire.com/releases/2005/2/emw209476.htm
Given the consistencies, so far, in the
way mental health "officials" have responded to my anti-slavery
activities, it would seem that any others of these professionals, at least in
our area, would report the same conclusions and recommendations, especially
since a common practice seems to be, rather than independent and objective
findings, relying heavily on past evaluations by others in their field.
Another aspect of this it that, by the
Committee/evaluation/report tying my anti-slavery beliefs and activity so
closely to this court case, in itself, probably actually
illustrates/demonstrates that which the report refers to as "the local
police departments, the prosecutor and the judge are involved in the
aforementioned 'conspiracies'," depending on how terms such as
"involvement" and "conspiracies" are being defined in this
case, i.e., how the Committee is using those terms.
In summary, its a dilemma that, if the
course being presented by "the system" is followed, it would result
in my continued detainment, unless, during that detainment, drastic steps are
taken to alter my personality, memory, etc., which would represent
unconscionable abuse and I can't imagine them doing.
Yes, all of this is totally illegal,
unconstitutional, a violation of rights and represents abuse of law and the
legal system. The question is how to counter-circumvent these actions.
I'd like to know your thoughts on this,
so far, including any other ideas you may have. Please also let me know what
questions you have, additional material you may need from me, etc..
and later:
I think I told you that I am trying/had
been trying to research the exact code of professional conduct for mental
health professionals that may relate to this - although I still haven't been
able to get back to that since we spoke yesterday. I am also going to [find
out what] entities may have oversight on this type of thing or even provide
certification on a voluntary basis (such as JCAHHO) and the guidelines such
entities may have established.
Tacked on, to reduce the size of no
pussyfooting!:
- Actually, this is one that I've been
attempting to incorporate into these emails for quite some time, but
relating hyperlinks have not yet been found. It is the situation involving
New London, CT and, if I recall: volunteer/paid fire fighters, sometime
between 1964 and 1978, and the "good ol' boy" system, that became
a landmark case in implementation of the, then, new civil rights laws. But I
still can't find reference to this on the internet, and can't take the time,
right now, to find it in one of the textbooks I still have from my
undergraduate law and/or labor relations coursework.
-
Recent
"possibly" related news/news alerts received (sorry, but not only
not able to verify that links to these articles are still good, but can't
even take the time to re-read what's been copied to here, if this email is
to even begin to be circulated):
-
03/06/2005
Human 'slave trade' and the attempts to stop it
Rockford Register Star - Rockford, IL, USA
... spas" have "safe rooms" used to hide the working
girls and evidence of prostitution. ... doors where working girls could
hide or escape in case of a police raid. ...
www.rrstar.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20050306/NEWS0107/503060311/1004/NEWS
-
02/03/2005
Islamic militants march in support of report linking
tsunami with ...
Borneo Bulletin - Borneo, Brunei Darussalam
29. Attajdid said that the Asian tsunami disaster was a warning to
Morocco to take measures against sex tourism, which it described as a
developing "calamity". ...
www.brunei-online.com/bb/tue/feb1w27.htm
-
01/31/2005
Article blamed tsunami on divine retribution
Index on Censorship - UK
.. after it was widely criticized for running a comment article theorizing
that the tsunami was caused by God's displeasure at the sex tourism
industry in South ... www.indexonline.org/en/indexindex/articles/2005/1/morocco-demonstration-in-support-of-tsunami-.shtml
-
01/31/2005
Newspaper claims tsunami was retribution for area's sex
trade
Scotsman - Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
... s moderate Islamic Justice and Development Party (PJD), claimed that
the disaster was brought on the area by God displeased with its
promotion of sex tourism. ...
thescotsman.scotsman.com/international.cfm?id=116032005
-
01/30/2005
Islamic militants march in support of newspaper
Jamaica Observer - Jamaica
... of a newspaper that caused a stir in Morocco with claims that Asia's
tsunami disaster amounted to godly retribution for the region's sex
tourism industry. ... www.jamaicaobserver.com/news/html/20050130T180000-0500_74218_OBS_ISLAMIC_
MILITANTS_MARCH_IN_
SUPPORT_OF_NEWSPAPER_.asp
-
01/30/05
Morocco protest over tsunami row
BBC News - London, England, UK
The newspaper of Morocco's Islamic party, PJD, said the disaster showed
God's displeasure with South-East Asia's sex tourism industry. ...
news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/4219755.stm
Other related news:
-
02/04/2005
Report: Computer System Hampers FBI Operations
By DAN EGGEN / Washington Post
The FBI is "significantly hampered" in its ability to prevent
terrorism and combat other serious crimes because of its continued failure
to overhaul antiquated and inefficient computer systems, the Justice
Department's chief watchdog said Thursday. A...
www.courant.com/hc-fbi0204.artfeb04,0,6572701.story
-
02/03/2005
LGV spreading throughout Western Europe, 2 cases in New York
Aidsmap - UK
... Many of these men reported sex tourism to European cities, including
Hamburg, Germany where four cases of LGV were confirmed in 2003, with more
suspected. ...
www.aidsmap.com/en/news/E67B12EE-15B6-4B13-8652-9655ACFB9580.asp
-
02/03/2005
NBI swoops down on alleged sex den inside hotel
INQ7 Interactive, Inc. - Philippines
... Among the evidence reportedly seized during the raid was a list of
women's
... The bureau reportedly only learned of the alleged prostitution at
Skyline following ... news.inq7.net/metro/index.php?index=1&story_id=26357
-
02/03/2005
Bawdy house charges dropped
CBC Calgary - Calgary, Alberta, Canada
... in December 2002, on allegations it was being used for prostitution and
group sex
... Locke says the raid damaged relations between the gay community and the
police ... calgary.cbc.ca/regional/servlet/View?filename=ca-bath-house-goliaths20050203
-
02/03/2005
Report Reveals Horrors of Foreign Sex-Slaves
Inter Press Service (subscription) - World
... forced into prostitution. We were held as sex slaves and forced to
service numerous clients,'' they said. ''Please save us from this ordeal.''.
A police raid on ...
www.ipsnews.net/africa/interna.asp?idnews=27285
-
02/02/2005
Drug Ring Tied To Mexican Supplier
By TINA A. BROWN / Courant Staff Writer
The tentacles of a huge crack cocaine ring halted recently in Hartford's
North End reached all the way to Mexico, where the leaders of the ring had
arranged to deliver 50 to 100 kilograms of cocaine per month to local
suppliers, according to government...
www.courant.com/news/local/hr/hc-crack0202.artfeb02,0,5078532.story
-
02/02/2005
Feds expand Conn. anti-terrorism team
Associated Press
The Justice Department is expanding its anti-terrorism division in
Connecticut, a unit recognized nationally for building cases against weapons
smugglers. Two veteran prosecutors, Assistant U.S. Attorneys Mark Rubino and
David Ring, are being reassigned...
www.courant.com/news/local/statewire/hc-02014940.apds.m0439.bc-ct--antifeb02,0,2571812.story
-
01/30/2005
Mexico carnage may spill into US
San Antonio Express (subscription) - San Antonio, TX, USA
... A Friday raid near Guadalajara marked the third time this month that Fox
... to let cartels operate in semi-sanctioned "zones of
tolerance," like prostitution. ...
www.mysanantonio.com/news/metro/stories/MYSA013005.1A.mexico_drug_war.58fd4e31.html
(Note: So far, this does not appear to have been published locally, i.e.,
by New London's The Day or by the Hartford Courant, although this is not
certain.)
RETURN
TO TOP OF PAGE
RETURN
TO HOME PAGE
03/12/05 - Author May Be "Missing, Presumed _ " By Time This is Read
(I'm sorry. The following is what I meant
to send you earlier. Please understand how shaken up I've been by the ordeal of
the last 48 hours.)
The following is supposed to be published
today, although I am receiving some flack - again. I don't have the url for it
yet, although it has started to accumulate statistics, so, evidently, has
already been posted to the PRWeb.com web site.
Author May Be "Missing, Presumed _
" By Time This is Read
(This is also a follow-up to “US
modern-day slavery advocate demands restitution for illegal detainment,” http://www.prweb.com/releases/2005/1/prweb202165.htm,
and “Court Orders Competence to Stand Trial Evaluation of Anti Modern-day
Slavery Advocate,” http://www.emediawire.com/releases/2005/2/emw209476.htm
. It also is in reference to “ ‘Remembering’ Needed To End Modern-Day
Slavery/Other Terrorism, http://www.emediawire.com/releases/2005/3/emw216035.htm.
)
Sent 3/7/05 in response to inquiry
(excerpt):
“…trying to straighten out my computer before getting out any more
communication…
“…The court sessions have been
continued at the request of the Office of Court Evaluation (OCE) because they
didn't have the report of my evaluation of 2/24 completed in time for the 3/4
scheduled court date. Last Thursday, 3/3, I finally effectively - sort of -
presented the motion to dismiss the case, due to lack of a speedy trial (ref: CT
Sec. 54-82m) but the judge was saying that the motion for the competence
evaluation takes precedence over that. I argued that the reason for that
evaluation, which the OCE explicitly stated to me, was to determine if I was
competent to represent myself as the defendant in my trial, even though I have a
stand by counsel (ref: CT Sec. 44-5) The judge argued that it was also to
determine if I was competent to stand trial (ref: CT Sec. 54-56d). My response
was that, either way, those issues would be moot if the case were dismissed. She
said she'd have to think about that.
“She also didn't remember that, on
2/3(?), she explicitly stated that the 1/31/05 submission of the motion to
dismiss (which marks the beginning of the clock ticking for the required 30 days
within which the trial has to commence after that (per CT Sec. 54-82m) would
stand as the date submitted, even though I had specifically asked that, and
possibly even asked for it to be specifically recorded, when she agreed to that.
She said that she is going to have to listen to the transcript of that hearing
to refresh her memory and that I should just wait until my next court appearance
on 3/11… “
Report by OCE was finally received today,
3/10/05, one day before next routine appointed court session. Actual document,
including my notes, can be viewed at http://mykindredspirit2.home.att.net/030905_OCE_report.htm.
Perhaps “only” my version: this is
fiction based on fiction, but, unfortunately, regardless of the impact of this
evaluation in the court, I was not able to tape the examination interview
without having first acquired a court order to do so, which, due to that
delaying the evaluation ordered to be done by the next court session, may have
resulted in another possible reason I’d be found in “contempt of court.“
In addition to that notated on the copy of the OCE report in the above link to
this press release, note that evaluation is based heavily on “testimony”
submitted for the court trial that yet to be heard. This is over and above two
statements made to me by “authorities,” i.e., per prosecutor prior to
evaluation, that the Pond House Incident (ref: “US Modern-Day Slavery Advocate
Demands Restitution For Illegal Detainment”) “would not play into any of
this” and, per OCE committee, something like that their role was not to
determine if I was innocent or guilty of criminal charges of subject case.
In my presentation for the evaluation, I
banked on the integrity of committee – what did I have to lose? I explained
what has been going on in spg/whatever defense in using anti slavery activity as
a basis for pejorative defense. As already revealed to the prosecutor, in trying
to explain the implications of his motion for competency evaluation, prior to
our meeting the OCE committee was presented with a copy/link to the press
release that was published just hours before the prosecutor’s motion for
competency evaluation – a surprise to me, despite that I’d just met with him
for at least 90 minutes, prior to this, and he’d made no mention of the motion
he was about to present. That press release was “US modern-day slavery
advocate demands restitution for illegal detainment.”
As seen in OCE documentation, referenced
CT Statutes, and investigation reported in/referenced in http://mykindredspirit:2.home.att.net, what may take place is:
· My “reported” detainment for, at least, 60 days, with possibly no
way the general public may verify my actual whereabouts and/or condition
· Court appointment of conservator/attorney, which will tie my hands in
speaking out and/or defending myself , or even communicating
· Accumulative pejorative, financial and psychological impact on efforts
in which I’ve been engaged, as well as on my individual being
In mind being incidents indicating that
those “under pressure” in all of this often try to use “non traditional
communication” to reveal actual situation, an observation is one of the pieces
of fiction included in this report: “The Committee” reports that I stated
that “Motivation comes into play, and I have to prove innocence” when,
actually what I said was that “relevance” will be a key issue in this but I
think I will be able to show, based on the CT Code of Evidence, the relevance of
what I will need to present to prove my innocence. However, this will be despite
the fact that one of the three judges who had, up until that time, been involved
in this, claimed that, despite that in the CT Code of Evidence, “the judge may
not allow” this.
Excerpts from previous press releases of
this author:
From “Modern-day slavery: just the tip
of the iceberg “:
· “We must recognize and publicize the scope and complexity of this
problem and be united in this fight. This is a global problem and overcoming it
requires coming together as one very strong and efficient global community.”
From “Questions that MUST be asked in
media reporting sex tourism, pedophilia, prostitution”:
· “What mechanism is in place to verify … the whereabouts of anyone
detained…?
Excerpts from the previous emails of this
string:
Subject: Re: __________
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 00:30:44 -0500
From: [Me]
To: _________@____________
Please, please be aware of what I've been trying to get out. You may find
press releases of mine by doing a search of my name, i.e., Marianne LaBrecque,
through googles.
There is another press release I am
currently writting. It will, most probably, be released on 03/12/05. The name
will be "Author May Be “Missing, Presumed _ ” By Time This is
Read"
This is NOT A F_____N HOAX!!!! This is
extremely real, so much so that sometime even I have problems believing it.
I will try to send you a copy of this
release, once I finnish writting it. However, 1) due to extreme exhaution of
the last almost 3 yrs - it's a long story - I've been inadvertently falling
asleep while working and not realizing it until I awake, and 2) I'm sorry, but
I'm too tired to remember what I'm trying to say - let's keep our fingers
crossed that I get it out before possibly becoming "missing."
And please, please >>> take
very, very good care Marianne LaBrecque
_________@____________ wrote:
Subject: re: prev msgs I've sent
you
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 23:22:02 -0500
From: [Me]
To: _________@____________
I'm sorry if I've freaked you out. But
please understand how much I am freaked out about all of this, as well.
c&p of msg that just went out to at
least 25+yr friends: mental health facility - but, believe me - I'm not sure
what is worse (haven't been in a jail, but know about it, from when Jack was
in one) One of the differences I see is that you have more freedom in a jail,
for example, in "mh" facilities, you are REQUIRED to participate in
that which they think you should be doing - and they have things programmed
for every second of your waking, and even sleeping, second, and, if you don't
participate/balk/respond in a way they may be able to record as something
negative... get the picture?
[yes, there is some update re:what
happened today, that I need to get out. But I also need to get some rest. So
just hang in there. (What are you and __________ doing tomorrow?)]
_________ wrote:
Is that in a regular jail or a
mental health program?
RETURN
TO TOP OF PAGE
RETURN
TO HOME PAGE
03/14/05 - An even more important reason for parental surveillance
[sent to ______________
<______________@anewspaper.com> and
"A Newspaper - ACity, ST" <________@anewspaper.com>]
Regarding Is _______________________?
Hello, ______________,
My name is Marianne LaBrecque and I am an advocate against modern-day slavery,
the fastest growing crime in the world today including in the U.S.. It includes
the forced prostitution and other sexual exploitation of teenagers, and even
younger children, both male and female. The dynamics behind it often involve
systematic and increasing bullying. "Slavers" are often people with
whom the victim and the community have been acquainted for some time before
learning about these crimes. Victims "abducted" by these slavers are
often forced to continue what may appear to be normal interaction with family
and friends.
Unfortunately, not enough people know
about this crime and the too many who do, because they are, in some manner, a
victim of it, are usually too afraid to talk about it. Media coverage has also
been extremely poor, particularly in reporting of US modern-day slavery.
Please find out about this issue and
encourage action against it, including by promoting awareness. One place to
start is the web site set up by the US government almost a year ago to help get
communities involved in efforts such as these. It is that of the Campaign to
Rescue & Restore Victims of Human Trafficking at http://www.acf.hhs.gov/trafficking/.
The information on that site is still scanty and may be misleading. It also
makes no mention of many of the dynamics behind this epidemic. Articles of mine
try to cover some of those gaps. They may be found through a search for my name
under google.com.
Feel free to let me know of any questions
you may have of me. In the meantime, I will add you and A Newspaper's ... to the
list of the media who receive occasional updates to the situation in which I am
involved or the overall issues relating to modern-day slavery. Please let me
know if you do not wish this done or, at any time, you would want your names
deleted.
Marianne LaBrecque
[mycellphone#]
http://mykindredspirit2.home.att.net
RETURN
TO TOP OF PAGE
RETURN
TO HOME PAGE
03/15/05 - v.2: Developments not going well
A response to a response already received to this email:
Subject: Re: Developments not going well
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 16:26:42 -0500
From: Marianne LaBrecque <marianne-lbrqu@att.net>
To: ______________
References: 1
She may be, but, if she is, she is possibly evidencing incredible fear - what I've seen so much throughout all of this.
______________ wrote:
Dear Marianne,
Maybe Beth is the lifeboat!?
Love, care and best intentions to you,
______________
-----Original Message-----
From: Marianne LaBrecque [mailto:marianne-lbrqu@att.net]
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 3:11 PM
To: ______________
Subject: Developments not going well
Note that the following case involves some
of the actual parties in this situation, i.e., Judge Susan Handy's court, of
which GA 10 is part, Norwich OCE, CT Valley Hospital, the state mental facility
for the criminally insane, to which it is apparently planned I be sent:
- Defendants are sued solely in
their individual capacities for ...
File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - View as HTML
... Plaintiff brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42. USC §1983, 18
USC §241,
... rights during her mental competency evaluation and while she ...
www.ctd.uscourts.gov/Opinions/090904.HBF.Marczeski.pdf
Also, there is need to be particularly
concerned about the behavior of Beth, the SPD hand-picked by the court - I was
permitted absolutely no input in selection - and who has now been assigned to
represent me in the competency hearing, thus tying my hands against helping
myself, in many ways.
The following are response to emails I
sent to Beth over the weekend, in accordance with an agreement SHE proposed!!
Much of those emails were included in 03/12/05
So much to relay - I've fallen so far behind!. Note that a response to these
was not received until Monday night, what she indicates in that response, and
what she admits in her next email (that in italic is what Beth wrote):
Subject: Re: Competency Eval and Fax
covers
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 21:07:40 -0500
From: Marianne LaBrecque <marianne-lbrqu@att.net>
To: CONRADLAW@aol.com
References: 1
Beth, Please explain
We need a plan ready for the 5th
of April if she rules against you
So, what happened to what I sent to
you on Saturday? Did you read it?
but hears there is a plan and
approves of it then the 60 day in patient is avoided.
I need local doc's and permission
to talk to them to get a a feel if they are willing to see you as an
outpatient client...
I need more explanation of what you
mean by "local doc's" etc., and the basis of your "needing to
know." I also need more of an explanation of what you mean by
"permission to talk to
them"
"get a a feel if they are willing to see you "
"as an outpatient client "
Time is of the essence.
Could you please provide an
appropriate response to what was sent to you this weekend, i.e. two days
ago, upon your suggestion on Friday, and also some indication that you may
have possibly read that material? (Could you please respond portion by
portion? I realize how you may consider this a particular "trial"
for you, but I have a great deal at stake in all of this.")
sorry, beth, but at least be fortunate
that you probably cannot relate to what i am undergoing!
CONRADLAW@aol.com wrote:
Marianne-We need a plan ready for
the 5th of April if she rules against you but hears there is a plan and
approves of it then the 60 day in patient is avoided. I need local doc's
and permission to talk to them to get a a feel if they are willing to see
you as an outpatient client...Time is of the essence.
Subject: Beth, please read
carefully
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 13:44:14 -0500
From: Marianne LaBrecque <marianne-lbrqu@att.net>
To: CONRADLAW@aol.com
References: 1
Beth,
I don't see the necessity of you being
the person to contact any possible provider. There are additional concerns I
would have in taking that course, as well, including privacy issues.
Have you been able to check with
anyone with a background in civil rights regarding competency?
Also, as far as "treatment and
counseling," again [I] would like to hear your thoughts on what I sent
to you over the weekend regarding that. There is a civil rights issue in
this that is just as important as the other issues involved. Those rights
must be protected and the plan we prepare now, for implementing now, must
include provisions for defending and protecting those rights.
Given the short amount of time we have
to prepare this and the graveness of this situation, I would feel much more
assured if we were to have been/are carrying out the email correspondence we
agreed upon on Friday.
It is very important that we have a
plan in place for addressing that hearing. Please carefully read the email,
subject: Competency Eval and Fax covers, that I sent to you on Saturday?
Again, as you said, time is of the essence. Please provide your thoughts on
what is said there.
CONRADLAW@aol.com wrote:
Yes, I
have skimmed over them(e-mails). I have some cases for you when we meet
at 9:oo a.m. tomorrow. I am not the best communicator through e-mail. I
meant assuming that the Judge finds you incompetent on 4/5/05-A Plan
needs to be presented at the conclusion of the hearing that avoids
in-patient at CVH-I want you start treatment and counseling ASAP to show
the judge that there is a plan-I want to be able to talk to the provider
of your choosing so the individual knows that this is important.
Subject: Re: Beth, please read
carefully
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 13:55:10 EST
From: CONRADLAW@aol.com
To: marianne-lbrqu@att.net
I will read them over in more detail
tonight-but I do not think that will cover everything-I understand your
privacy issues about me speaking to your hypothetical treatment provider. I've
closed the door on that............I will assume that you will be meeting with
me tommorow at 9:00 p.m.-Civil Rights lawyers with good reputations would be
Atty John Williams in New Haven and Attorney Norm Patis in Bethel Ct
Prepared to send to Beth but
not. An excerpt of another
email, sent to someone else, that follows, explains why:
Subject: Beth, this needs immediate
attention
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 13:07:54 -0500
From: Marianne LaBrecque <marianne-lbrqu@att.net>
Hello, Beth,
I want to request another
SPD to represent me in this Competency hearing, one with more of a
background in civil rights in competency hearings.
This action of mine should not be
viewed as a criticism of your work.
It is necessary for this to be done
immediately, particularly since that person will have to be brought up to
date on a great deal before being able to even have a chance of being
productive in this. I would like to be able to request this of the judge
today, but, based on my earlier experience with the clerk's office, the
clerks' office probably will, again, deny my permission to make request to
go before the judge. Because of this, I am asking that you make the
necessary arrangements with that office. It may also be necessary for you to
be present, but that shouldn't be a basis for postponement of this being
requested of the judge.
Marianne LaBrecque
303-1999
The other sent out, that includes the
reasons why the above was not:
...Right now, I'm preparing a request
for another SPD, one with more of a background in civil rights in competency
hearings, but I don't really think that one will be available, have reason to
believe that that person, also, will most probably be approached by "the
gang," and just my taking that action may be used by the judge to have me
immediately detained through "inpatient hospitalization." So I
haven't yet decided if I am going to take that approach, but, if I do, I
should try to make that request today, before my next appointment, tomorrow,
with the current SPD.
I'm also aware that part of the efforts
against me include causing my financial demise.
Again - and as you may also gather from
reading the above - any input, suggestions, HELP!!!!! - SEND ME A LIFEBOAT!!! -
would be greatly appreciated.
Love,
Marianne
P.S. - It will probably be an absolute
miracle if I do not suffer a heart attack - somewhere about beginning now - as a
result of all of this continuing trauma.
P.P.S. - For possibly obvious reasons,
i.e., exhaustion, I'm not going to be sending this out - right now anyway - as a
"general circulation" "community email." However, if any of
you are spidering out emails, or would like to start: this is a good time; feel
free to forward this to as many and all that you can.
RETURN
TO TOP OF PAGE
RETURN
TO HOME PAGE
03/18/05 - Is there anyone there with an ear?
If so, how may I access that?
I represent a number of oppressed people
throughout the world, but came into these efforts by eye witnessing the
abduction into modern-day slavery of my Love, now my fiancé.
I, myself, am now needing support, as
well, against the retaliation to which I am being subjected for speaking out
against these atrocities. Please understand that, yes, this persecution is
having an impact on my stamina and possibly my ability to concentrate - there
are indications that I am experiencing the effects of extreme exhaustion over
the course of a three year span, despite attempts by me to offset this.
Articles I've written about this can be
found by doing a search for my name, Marianne LaBrecque, through, for example, google.com.
There is also a web site set up regarding this, although it is suffering the
effects of that to which it's author/maintainer, i.e., I, am being subjected.
The web site is http://mykindredspirit2.home.att.net.
Please, please help in this.
It is probably only a miracle that I am
even able to communicate with you now. Author May Be "Missing,
Presumed _ " By Time This is Read, www.emediawire.com/releases/2005/3/emw217377.htm,
released 3/12/05, may explain why I say that. It was released one day after, but
prepared two days before, I was originally slated to be illegally detained in a
US facility for the "criminally insane" based on the
"system's" interpretation of my advocacy against modern day slavery.
I will answer any and all concerns you may
have, regarding this. I also realize that I may not be contacting the
appropriate part of your organization for this communication to even have any
effect, but I am hoping that, whoever receives this, will find it in their heart
to relay it to the appropriate person/people.
May Peace (and the end of slavery) Come
Soon!
Marianne LaBrecque
[phone#]
_______________
USA
RETURN
TO TOP OF PAGE
RETURN
TO HOME PAGE
03/19/05 - SOS - in whatever language!!!!!!!
This was much of the same text as 03/18/05
- Is there anyone there with an ear? with the following additions or
changes:
Admittedly, I am getting so desperate that
I don't even know to whom I'm sending these messages.
[The rest was the same as that in 03/18/05
- Is there anyone there with an ear?]
RETURN
TO TOP OF PAGE
RETURN
TO HOME PAGE
03/21/05 - [Fwd: Response to the four statements]
Hi Guys,
This is also a response to [a local friend]'s offer to store some of my things
at his house. I'd also like to wait to see if any similar offers are made, so
that I can determine how much can be stored, in that way, and prioritize what
still needs to be done.
I'm also trying to weigh whether or not
things should start being moved now - when I can help guide that, and also when
I'd be able to do much of the moving, and any more packing that may be needed,
myself - or to take the "chance" that I may "win" the
competency hearing ( dreaming: perhaps, then, my motion to dismiss the criminal
case will even be approved!), in which case, the moving may have been done for
naught, depending on what I decide to do, at that point, regarding remaining in
this geographical area.
I'm forwarding a copy of the email I just
sent out to the SPD (Special Public Defender) in preparation for the competency
hearing on April 5th - ironically also the third anniversary of Dave _______ and
my "awareness" of our feelings for one another. I meet with [SPD]
again tomorrow, at 11 am. At the end of this email, I've also included
hyperlinks to the articles I've faxed to her that may help back up my position.
But, if I do go into CVH, there is a very,
very good chance that it will be much, much longer than "just" 60
days, that, in fact, it could even be for the rest of my life. Part of the
reason I say this is what you will see in the last part of the email I am
forwarding to you, relating to the "Pond House incident" and also -
something that isn't included there:
The "Discharge Criteria" given
in the Pond House report [see http://mykindredspirit2.home.att.net/PondHouseRpts.htm]
is "Pt. will report [an arrow pointing down] in delusional thinking and a
[an arrow pointing down] in psychosis [ditto marks]." This is on the form
of those records call the "Inpatient Psychiatry Interdisciplinary Treatment
Plan" that was dated on 8/10/04 - the second day of my detainment, the day
I was admitted to Pond House, and seven days before I was released AMA, i.e.,
against medical advice. However, I did not learn of this criteria until I was
reviewing the copy of the Pond House records that I received in the beginning of
October. (Requests of mine, such as this, were not honored during the period
that I had a "temporary conservator" appointed to me, a period that
extended past the period in which I could appeal the decision made in the
probable cause hearing, thus prohibiting me from appealing, as well.) In lieu of
my signature on this "Inpatient Psychiatry Interdisciplinary Treatment
Plan" is written "pt. very difficult would not sign release," and
perhaps was referring to something else I actually did refuse to sign, but how
many people would pick up on that?
I think that there is enough of a pattern
to constitute evidence that the same games will be played at CVH, and then some!
But I'd appreciate additional analysis of
this situation, that may be more objective than mine. Also some input in the
decisions I have to make regarding the storage of my belongings.
Will peace ever come?
Marianne
P.S. - Also be aware/keep in mind that I
don't hear well, am working on the third floor, most of the time, so would
probably not hear you if you just stop by, even if you ring the door bell.
(Don't know why, but I can't take any more time fiddling with those door bells
to get them to work in a way so that I can hear them when some presses them,
although my neighbors' doorbells ring on my chimes, as well - THOSE I hear!)
So, please call me on my cell phone ([my
cell phone#]) to let me know you are here, whether or not you've already told me
that you are coming. In lieu of that, keep throwing gravel at the third floor
window until I come to the door. Just don't break the window - I already have
more than enough to do.
Thanks guys.
Subject:
Response to the four statments
Date:
Mon, 21 Mar 2005 08:16:16 -0500
From: Marianne
LaBrecque <marianne-lbrqu@att.net>
To: [SPD's email address]
References: 1
[NOTE: Articles relating to Fax 10-12
are being sent to your office this morning.]
[SPD],
I've tried to format this email in a way that would be easier for you to scan
through.
Based on your email, I take it that the
strategy you are considering for the competency hearing is presenting a
depiction of my anti-slavery/advocacy activity and its reasonableness, and you
are trying to determine how I would respond to the four statements you listed,
as well as the the rest you've said in that email.
Three of the four statements that you've
written of me making are not exactly what I've said, but I guess they are close
enough. The fourth is not something that I've not said nor would say but I think
I may know the source of the confusion:
1) "That local, state and federal law
enforcement are ill-equipped to deal with Domestic Terrorist
who specializes in human trafficking and Slavery in the United States because
of the lack of statistical data (not being reported) which prevents
the general public from being alerted to this urgent crisis."
Re: "human trafficking and
Slavery"
I consider the terms of "human trafficking" and "modern-day
slavery" as having the same definition, but I tend to use the term
"modern-day slavery" because many people appear to assume that
"human trafficking" means human smuggling, a crime which may or may
not associated with a particular incident of modern-day slavery. The definition
I use for "human trafficking" and "modern-day slavery" is
how they are defined in 18 USC CHAPTER 77, particularly Sections 1589 though
1590:
providing or obtaining the labor or
services, including sexual services, of a person through threat of harm to
that person or to another person, use of restraints, or schemes that
constitute threats of such. It also applies to the sexual exploitation of
children and other minors.
This is a summarized interpretation of
those federal code sections. In my writings, I usually cite the actual sections
individually and include the actual text of the law.
Re: local, state and federal law
enforcement are ill-equipped
That local, state and federal law enforcement are ill-equipped to deal with
human trafficking/modern-day slavery in the United States relates to law
enforcement education and training in this area as well as to the lack of
an appropriate intelligence system:
The education and training need is
a well publicized fact and the reason that so much federal money is being
appropriated to address this area. Bush's July 2004 Tampa speech, the one I
reference later in this email to you right now, was at the first national
training conference to be held for the purpose of training law enforcement,
regarding this crime. There are other news articles I can provide relating to
this as well, in addition to the articles relating to Bush's speech. [See Fax 2
sent to you 03/18/05.]
My own research and experience also
substantiates this need. For example, I became aware, in my conversation with
him, that the Commander of the CT State Police Missing Persons Unit not only did
not have protocol in place for investigations relating to this crime, but also,
at the time, claimed he was unaware that there was such a crime. (This of,
reportedly, the fastest growing crime in the world!) In my conversation with the
Commander of the State's Organized Crime unit, I learned that, up until that
conversation, he thought that human trafficking referred only to the illegal
smuggling of people across international borders, i.e., human smuggling. I'd
have to refer to my notes to see what was actually said but, if I recall, it was
the same in my conversation with the Commander of the Eastern CT Major Crime
Squad. All of these conversations took place as part of my attempts to get
David's situation investigated.
Additional gaps in the US intelligence
system have become evident to me, and now are also being reported in many
news stories, other than those I publish. An example is the lack of a mechanism
for tracking information submitted, by either the public or by security
agencies. This is in addition to that relating to the statistical data being
generated by these systems. Law enforcement is not the only party ill-equipped
due to gaps in the US intelligence system. It also results in the public not
being able to perform the scrutiny that may force better accountability and less
corruption in the infrastructure. Probably the most recent press release I
published relating to this was on 01/10/05, "Effort farce: checks and
balances against modern-day slavery, other terrorism - organized crime" at www.prweb.com/releases/2005/01/prweb192569.htm.
The next day, 01/11/05, someone else published something that included his
findings that happened to illustrate what I've been saying. In John Foley's
article that day, he was reporting on an increase in reports being made to the
National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, which collects and
"tracks" tips relating to suspected child pornography, as well as
child prostitution, online enticement, sexual molestation, and "child sex
tourism":
"Yet, there's no way to track how
many of the tips collected by the National Center for Missing and Exploited
Children lead to arrests or convictions. Some experts believe law-enforcement
agencies can't keep up with the scope of the problem. 'The number of
prosecutions is very small,' says Parry Aftab, executive director of
WiredSafety.org, a nonprofit organization devoted to online safety."
Re: lack of statistical data
My statements relating to statistical data are also based on that reported in Human
Trafficking: A Growing Criminal Market in the U.S., www.ojp.usdoj.gov/nij/international/ht.html,
by James O. Finckenauer and Jennifer Schrock, International Center, National
Institute of Justice, The Research, Development and Evaluation Agency of the
U.S. Department of Justice, United Nations Activities:
"...a lack of systematic research
means that reliable data on the trafficking of human beings that would allow
comparative analyses and the design of countermeasures is scarce..."
This reference, including the hyperlink,
is included in my 04/30/04 press release "Government reform needed to fight
U.S. modern-day slavery" which I didn't give you, nor the OCE, but you may
have accessed in your research. Most statements I make like this are referenced
in this way, i.e., with full identification of the article and a hyperlink to
it. [See first fax of 03/18/05 sent to you]
What I'm saying is that the reason that
statistical data does not exist, or is unreliable, is most probably because
cases being reported, or requests for investigation into possible incidents of
this crime, are not being recorded by the law enforcement agencies receiving
that information, or being recorded improperly, i.e., as something not related
to human trafficking. This is based on my own experience and investigation,
including acquiring copies of agencies' records. It is also backed up by reports
by others, including that revealed in news articles, particularly those relating
to immigration and prostitution arrests.
Re: preventing the general public from
being alerted
The incompleteness and unreliability of statistical data and other information
generated by intelligence systems have a far more reaching effect than merely
not enabling the general public to be aware of an urgent situation. Such
information is also an essential management tool for security and other
essential entities, and lack of such sabotages the functionality of our
infrastructure. These are some of the dynamics I explore in my writings related
to my advocacy efforts. They are intertwined with the dynamics relating to the
networked crime schemes that support and protect these crimes and, as such,
organized crime. (See later comments regarding "organized crime.")
Re: not being reported
In addition to reports and other strong evidence that suggests that law
enforcement is not recording reports of this crime, there are many more reports
of victims not being able to report it, due to fear. There have also been many
reports of people being afraid to "squeal" in regard to most crimes.
This includes local news reports of recent local shooting victims refusing to
tell police who shot them, and at least one report, that I recall, of each
person at the scene of a gruesome murder, in Norwich, if I recall, being forced
to participate in further assaulting the victim and, reportedly, later told
police that it was in order to prevent them from "squealing."
Re: Domestic Terrorist
The association of this phenomena with "domestic terrorism" is
something I have been trying to get people to see. All just stated begins to
illustrate why I often use the term "domestic terrorists" in reference
to perpetrators of this crime, particularly as it is being carried out locally.
My use of that term, in this respect, is based on federal definition of
''domestic terrorism":
crimes involving acts dangerous to human
life that appear to be intended to intimidate or coerce a civilian population,
and occur primarily within the United States.
There are also additional parts of this
definition supplied in 18 USC 113B that may apply here, but just this should
suffice, for now.
Reports by federal authorities have
indicated a concern that profits of this crime, as well as from drug and gun
trafficking, may be funding world terrorist activity. Federal reports also state
that these three areas of trafficking, i.e., human, drug and gun trafficking,
are the major source of revenue for organized crime. However, human trafficking
is reportedly now the fastest growing crime, the most lucrative of these three,
and is now estimated to be rivaling the other two as the major source of
revenue. Recent reports by federal authorities are also now beginning to allude
to this crime as a terrorism issue.
Re: urgent crisis
The urgency of this situation has also been stressed by federal officials,
including some of the top ranking officials of the State Department, the
Department of Justice, and Health and Human Services. For example, what I've
been saying is mirrored in statements of John P. Torres, of the Department of
Homeland Security (DHS) released on May 20, 2004, relating to the lucrativeness
of this crime and the urgency to address it. [Fax 10 sent during the weekend]
"Human Smuggling a National Security
Risk, U.S. Official Says - Torres says
human trafficking "pipeline" could serve terrorists":
"Human smuggling and trafficking
into the United States constitute a significant risk to national security and
public safety, ...
"This international criminal market
is extraordinarily lucrative, generating an estimated $9.5 billion in profit
for criminal organizations worldwide," he said. "In many cases,
these profits fuel additional criminal enterprises, such as the trafficking of
drugs, weapons, or other contraband, or the funds are laundered and invested
in legitimate business enterprises. These untraced profits feed organized
crime activities, undermining governmental action and the rule of law, while
allowing these criminal networks to grow stronger, more resilient, and more
dangerous."
Again, particularly at the time these
above statements were made by Torres, the focus of reports by the US government
was on trafficking US victims who are immigrants. In addition, Torres is with
DHS's bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) so would expect to
focus only on immigrants.
2) that domestic terrorist have infiltrated
law enforcement agencies and the judicial system as well as organized
crime to keep the crime (kidnapping victims) from surfacing in the
public
This is not exactly what I've said. What
would be a more accurate statement of what I say is:
Domestic terrorists and/or organized
crime appear to have infiltrated almost each component and level of our
infrastructure, including various levels of law enforcement and other
governmental agencies. There is possible evidence, or it is highly suspected,
that this is being done to promote and/or protect criminal activities,
including obstructing investigation into possible modern-day slavery
situations and other crimes.
Re: infiltrated law enforcement
agencies and the judicial system
What I am saying is similar to that also said in the Human Trafficking: A
Growing Criminal Market in the U.S. report previously referenced. It is also
possibly implied in a quote of HHS's Steve Wagner, that I use under statement 3,
regarding my mission.
Something similar to what I've said for
probably well over a year, relating to infiltration, has also been publicized in
a number of news reports by a US government official over the last week or so.
Although these particular quotes I'm using, below, refer to "spies" -
I'm just re-using quotes from my emails, here, rather than pulling up the whole
article - the concern is related to terrorists, including domestic terrorists,
and those who commit other serious crimes [but, even after additional search
this afternoon, I've been unable to locate the, as well, reference to
"serious crimes," although I think I have a hard-copy of an article
published over the last two weeks]:
03/12/2005 An offensively weak
defense
[COMMENTARY by Maureen Dowd]
(New London Day - not hyperlinking)
"PaulRedmond, a longtime CIA officer, said it was an 'actuarial
certainty' that spies had infiltrated U.S. security agencies..."
One of the original news stories that is
the basis of that COMMENTARY:
03/06/2005 - US Intelligence Reforms
Seen Posing New Dangers
ABC News
... "It's an absolute certainty that there are spies now in the
national intelligence establishment," former CIA agent Paul Redmond told
a counterintelligence ...
abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory?id=555541
[See Fax 6 sent to you 03/18/05.]
The difference in my speculation is that
much of this "infiltration" may be being carried out by administrative
staff in these agencies being told or pressured to do small aspects of what
contributes to this, but many of whom, possibly most, may not be aware of that
to which they may be contributing. They may not even be aware that it is against
what may have been the established procedures and practices of that
organization. I've also experienced activities, in various parts of the
infrastructure, of what could possibly be evidence of activities that were
previously, i.e., in the '70's - 90's, considered those of "corporate
spies" or those who had adopted such tactics for other reasons.
re: organized crime
By "organized crime" I do not necessarily mean the Mafia or any other
similar well established crime organizations. I am defining "organized
crime" in the same way it is defined in FBI glossary at www.fbi.gov/hq/cid/orgcrime/glossary.htm
I've also received verbal verification from federal authorities that the kind of
activities I am describing, relating to this, would be considered
"organized crime":
"a group having some manner of a
formalized structure and whose primary objective is to obtain money through
illegal activities. Such groups maintain their position through the use of
actual or threatened violence, corrupt public officials, graft, or extortion,
and generally have a significant impact on the people in their locales,
region, or the country as a whole."
I refer to it in relation to gaps in the
infrastructure that need to be closed to appropriately address investigation
into this crime, such as that explained my press release of 4/30/04:
Often, intricate coordination of a
number of individuals is required to carry out the clandestine operations
surrounding abduction for the purpose of slavery as well as the subsequent
slavery activities. In this way, such operations fall under the definition of
organized crime.... The overly simplistic approach of U.S. investigative
authorities fails to take the aspects of possible organized crime into
consideration in response to information of abduction and slavery activities
within it's boundaries. This is particularly true regarding security
mechanisms for potential informants and information.
Re: kidnapping
Regarding my use of the term "kidnapping" or "abduction,"
that is based on federal definition provided in 18 USC 55, i.e.,
"unlawfully seizes, confines,
inveigles, decoys, kidnaps, abducts, or carries away and holds for ransom or
reward or otherwise any person, except in the case of a minor by the parent
thereof"
3) That your mission is to educate the
public regarding this by offering to help law enforcement and to alert
the public to the mode of operation used and rescue operations tragedies
to rescue victims.
I'm not capable of rescuing victims and I
don't try to do that. My mission is two-fold:
- To increase public awareness of this
crime, including education of law enforcement, in order to promote the
identification of possible victims, schemes being used by perpetrators, and
gaps in the infrastructure that are enabling the proliferation of this
crime, in order to facilitate victim rescue, and push for the changes
needed, or the public outcry needed to push changes needed, to close those
gaps that are enabling such schemes.
- To continue to push for effective
investigation of possible local situations relating to these crimes.
Much of the first part of that mission
statement is close to that described on the web page that I hyperlinked to you
in the Plan B email a week ago Friday, on 3/11/05. Don't confuse that with my
web site. [See Fax 2, including resending of Fax 2, sent to you 03/18/05.] It is
the web site of the U.S. Dept of Health and Human Services ACF's Campaign to
Rescue & Restore Victims of Human Trafficking, http://www.acf.hhs.gov/trafficking/coalition/index.html
(HHS) and are the activities HHS suggests for local coalitions working in these
efforts. It is also pretty much what I'd been doing for quite a while before
that Campaign even began, last April.
I also faxed that page to the OCE, prior
to the evaluation, but Mike Migaldi said that some of the material was not
forwarded to the Committee, and, I think, of what was, was only given to one
Committee member, because the others did not work at that office. When I spoke
to the Committee, they seemed to be unaware of much of the material I'd sent in
ahead of time, although when questioned by the psychiatrist who was part of the
Committee, the social worker who appeared at court last Friday claimed to have
the material.
That material is further explained in
statements by Steve Wagner, director of the HHS Campaign, published in May 20,
2004, just after the Campaign began:
"We believe the problem is
ubiquitous, affecting urban and rural communities across the country."
Implications of the possible collusion, or
other impediments caused by ignorance of law enforcement, in relation to this
crime, is possibly implied in another statement he makes in that press release:
"Wagner said greater public
awareness and the development of alternative ways for victims and
intermediaries to come forward -- without immediately contacting law
enforcement -- are two keys to promoting more effective implementation of TVPA
[Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000] in the United States. " This
is from "U.S. Expanding Efforts to Reach Trafficking Victims -Education
and outreach at the grass-roots level is key" [Fax 11, sent during the
weekend]
4) That clearly the competency exam is being used by infiltrating terrorist to
prevent you from telling the truth
I did not claim this. I would have to
see/know what you are referencing to interpret what you are reading. It may be
confusion between two of my press releases I sent to you, one having to do with
what I refer to as the "Pond House incident" in my notations on the
OCE report, US modern-day slavery advocate demands restitution for illegal
detainment, that was published a few hours before the motion was made for a
competency evaluation, and the other having to do with those orders for that
evaluation, Court Orders Competence to Stand Trial Evaluation of Anti
Modern-day Slavery Advocate, that was published a week before the actual
evaluation.
(By the way, the judge sounds as though
she is also probably going to base a great deal on my refusing to release
permission for OCE to review the records referring to "Pond House
incident":
- I brought a copy of the records with
me, when I met with the OCE evaluation Committee and I showed it to them,
pointing out the key information (it's about 95 pages of material) and some
other parts of the records, including
- That the "diagnosis" was
based on a false police report that had been submitted to the hospital
and my belief that modern-day slavery exists, which is reported as
expressing "delusional material, i.e., alien slavery"
- The "medical" report
indicates that the falsehood of that police report was proven in the
testimony of the police officer involved and another person involved,
when they appeared as witnesses at the second session of the probable
cause hearing, eight days into my detainment
- "Primary problem" being
that I was saying that I was being detained unjustifiably;
"illness" that I was involved in trying to have major crimes
investigated
- I sent them a copy of the press
release, US modern-day slavery advocate demands restitution for illegal
detainment, published a few hours before, so submitted two days before, I
learned about the motion for a competency evaluation, but, again, the
material may not have been made available to the Committee members.
- I fully explained to them why I didn't
think it appropriate for them to records relating to that incident, for
reasons also described in the press release.
- The prosecutor who made the motion,
Lonnie Braxton, assured me, after the motion was approved, that the
"Pond House
incident" "would not come into play" in the
evaluation by OCE, that the OCE's evaluation would be independent. I relayed
this to the committee as the second reason I was not releasing those records
to them.
Re: "Do you have any collaborating
witness to support this willing to come and testify"
I'm not sure what you are referring to here. Is it my advocacy work or is it my
competency? As far as my competency, yes. If the advocacy work, is it the
legitimacy or that I am actually doing it? If the legitimacy, can the HHS page
that I linked above suffice? If that I'm actually doing it and what I am doing,
can the press releases be used as evidence or a printout of the list of
references in google.com? There were 236 for "Court Orders Competence to
Stand Trial Evaluation of Anti Modern-day Slavery Advocate" just now, when
I checked (This was the day after I received your email. Some may have since
expired.)
There are a number of people who
specialize in the work that I do, or similarly enough: Derek Ellerman, for
example, of Polaris Project in DC. http://polarisproject.org/polarisproject/,
[See Fax 5 sent to you 03/18/05.] as well as people the President highlighted in
his speech in Tampa last July. [See Fax 3 and Fax 9 sent to you 03/18/05.]
Emmett McGroarty, whose contact information is on the US H&H Campaign site
I've mentioned, should also be able to explain this type of work. He is also
well aware of my work. [See Fax 2 (including resending of this fax) sent to you
03/18/05.] But, again, these are not local people.
There was also a CT bill submitted by
Andrea Stillman, of Waterford, last year to study the extent of human
trafficking/modern-day slavery in CT. The committee began meeting last October,
I believe. [Fax 4]
There are also hundreds of news articles
relating to this crime, although rarely in newspapers in our area, even though
the stories are sometimes what is considered "national" stories, such
as the President's speech against human trafficking in Tampa last July, http://www.alligator.org/edit/news/issues/stories/040720bush.html,
for example. However, the focus of most articles and most funding within the
U.S. has been on immigrants who are victims of modern-day slavery/human
trafficking. More recently, there have also been a great deal on the sexual
exploitation of children in sex tourism.
re: the "slow rate of speed"
What I said was that the police report did not say that that was why they
stopped me. A slow rate of speed is the posted speed for that section of Rt 27
on which we were driving. I was doing the speed limit. Right now, I'm focusing
on the competency hearing, so I won't comment about the charges right now.
re: The cases are State v. Jacob's and
State V. Sells which discusses Competency evaluations, common law and
constitutional rights.
Is there any way that I can access these via the internet so that I may have
a better idea of what you have in mind? I may be able to find them if I had the
full name of the defendants.
The reference to civil rights is related
to my right to engage in anti-slavery activities without it being the cause for
my competency to be questioned.
Subject: Fax & cover note
03/18/05-03/21/05 [sent to [SPD]]
[SPD] ,
[SPD admin asst] had indicated, a while ago, that you were having problems
accessing the internet from your computer at home. In case you still are, I'm
faxing you the internet references that are included in the email I'm preparing
- which I hope to get out to you by the end of the day. Due to some other things
that came in, I'm just not being able to get back to finishing that.
This one is the source of what you've
included in the first of the four statements in your email.
www.ojp.usdoj.gov/nij/international/ht.html
(Fax 1)
Fax 2
(For some reason, when being printed directly from the internet, first page is
printing blank on faxing. What's being faxed here, imbedded graphics, such as
the logos, are not included.) This one is from the web site of the U.S. Dept of
Health and Human Services ACF's Campaign to Rescue & Restore Victims of
Human Trafficking (HHS) and are the activities that it suggests for local
coalitions working in these efforts, and pretty much what I've been doing for
quite a while before that Campaign even began, last April. This page also
includes the contact information for Emmett McGroarty.
http://www.acf.hhs.gov/trafficking/coalition/index.html
Fax 3
This is one of the articles relating to Bush's speech last July. I'm still
looking for an article, relating to this, in which he describes the work of
people there, as part of his presentation, who are doing work similar to what I
am doing. Unfortunately, many of the links I have to these articles are no
longer good. I may not be able to get to do additional research on this until
this weekend. http://www.alligator.org/edit/news/issues/stories/040720bush.html
Fax 4
This is the Interagency Task Force on Trafficking in Persons bill that was
presented by Andrea Stillman, Waterford [i.e., town in which I've been living
since 1978], last year.
www.cga.ct.gov/2004/fc/2004HB-05358-R000218-FC.htm
Fax 5
There are a number of people who specialize in the work that I do, or similarly
enough: Derek Ellerman, for example, of Polaris Project in DC. This is from that
organization's web site. I can provide many, many more.
http://polarisproject.org/polarisproject/
Fax 6
These are recently published articles relating to the infiltration of U.S.
security agencies by terrorists/criminals, i.e., "spies.".
So far today, trying to access some of these articles is causing my computer to
bomb out - the type of internet problem that seems to occur more often on
Fridays, it seems. Some of these articles are commentaries, while the rest are
actual news stories. One of those commentaries was printed in the New London Day
[=our local newspaper] on March 6, I believe it was ( not taking the time to
find my copy, right now.)
Fax 7
This is page 3 of 11 pages of google.com search results for my article
"Court Orders Competence to Stand Trial Evaluation of Anti Modern-day
Slavery Advocate" that was published on 2/17/05, a week before my
evaluation by OCE. (I wasn't able to easily print-to-fax more than one google
page at a time.)
Fax 8
Describes the work of another person doing work similar to that of my efforts. www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20040721/news_1mi21prost.html
Fax 9
This includes the text of Bush's Tampa speech which also describes the work of
others that is similar to mine. It is the a url I hoped to find earlier and
referenced when sending Fax 3.
usembassy.state.gov/mumbai/wwwhwashnews2132.html
(sent Sunday)
Fax 10
Statements of John P. Torres, of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
released on May 20, 2004 mumbai.usconsulate.gov/wwwhwashnews1853.html
Fax 11
Statements by Steve Wagner, director of the HHS Campaign, published in May 20,
2004, just after the Campaign began mumbai.usconsulate.gov/wwwhwashnews1855.html
Fax 12
Jan 11, 2005 News release by John Foley relating to poor law enforcement
response to reports relating to this crime www.internetweek.com/allStories/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=57700627
[SPD's email address] wrote:
I have read your e-mails and have
reviewed the e-mail material sent to the Forsenic team-Basically, you are
stating 1) That local, state and federal law enforcement are ill-equipped to
deal with Domestic Terrorist who specializes in human trafficking and Slavery
in the United States because of the lack of statistical data (not being
reported) which prevents the general public from being alerted to this urgent
crisis. and 2) that domestic terrorist have infiltrated law enforcement
agencies and the judicial system as well as organized crime to keep the crime
(kidnapping victims) from surfacing in the public 3) That your mission is to
educate the public regarding this by offering to help law enforcement and to
alert the public to the mode of operation used and rescue operations tragedies
to rescue victims. 4) That clearly the competency exam is being used by
infiltrating terrorist to prevent you from telling the truth- Do you have any
collaborating witness to support this willing to come and testify-I know your
response will be that they cannot disclosed their identity in public for fear
of retribution by the group of friends/domestic terrorist. The basically your
belief or evidence by the Judge will be is this a person who is rational who
can assist an attorney or provide assistance in her defense. I realize based
on what you told me that the Stonington Police Dept. is in on this but you
case will be hard to prove base on the breathizer which indicates your blood
alcohol level you need an expert to challenge it. The police report did
indicate a slow rate of speed-I gave you names of two attorneys that take
civil right violations-In my opinion if a plan for quote "treatment"
is not presented the same day after the hearing and the Judge finds you
incompetent despite cross-examination or presentation of witnesses then you
will go to CVH. I am more interested in punching holes in the report give me a
witness who specializes also in the work you do.........It is true I do not
spend large amounts of time on e-mail but I do adequately review e-mails and
respond in time but maybe not fast enough for you. And Beleive Me,I do
understand the strain you are under with a looming hearing hanging over you.
Work with me with a common sense stragedy-The cases are State v. Jacob's and
State V. Sells which discusses Competency evaluations, common law and
constitutional rights.
RETURN
TO TOP OF PAGE
RETURN
TO HOME PAGE
03/26/05 - [Fwd: Google Alert -
"marianne labrecque"]
Subject: Google Alert - "marianne
labrecque"
Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 00:47:06 -0800
(PST)
From: Google Alerts <googlealerts-noreply@google.com>
To: marianne-lbrqu@att.net
Google Alert for: "marianne labrecque"
Detainment
of Anti US Slavery Advocate Postponed for Hearing
Emediawire (press release) - Ferndale,WA,USA
(PRWEB) March 26, 2005 -- OCE's recommended 3/11/05 detainment of anti-slavery
activist, Marianne LaBrecque, has been postponed pending a 4/5/05
hearing of ...
[http://www.emediawire.com/releases/2005/3/emw221893.htm]
This as it happens Google Alert is
brought to you by Google.
Remove
this alert.
Create another alert.
Manage your alerts.
RETURN
TO TOP OF PAGE
RETURN
TO HOME PAGE
03/27/05 - Please read email and attachment ASAP
Is there any way that your organization
may help in these efforts, if only by simply spidering out communications in
support of the mission outlined in the press release referenced in what is being
forwarded to you?
I represent a number of oppressed people
throughout the world, but came into these efforts by eye witnessing the
abduction into modern-day slavery, here, in the US, of my Love, David, who is
now my fiancé.
I, myself, am now needing support, as
well, against the retaliation to which I am being subjected for speaking out
against these atrocities.
Links to all articles I've written are
listed on mykindredspirit2.home.att.net/PressReleases.htm. Some can also be
found by doing a search for my name, Marianne LaBrecque, through, for example,
google.com.
Please understand something that may be
impacting the tone and mechanisms I am using in my activities, as well as the
present condition of the above web site: this persecution is having an impact on
my stamina and possibly my ability to concentrate, and, up until very recently,
there had been indications that I was experiencing the effects of extreme
exhaustion over the course of a three year span, despite my attempts to correct
it.
I will answer any and all concerns you may
have, regarding this. I also realize that I may not be contacting the
appropriate part of your organization for this communication to even have any
effect, but I am hoping that, whoever receives this, will find it in their heart
to relay it to the appropriate person/people.
Marianne LaBrecque
[phone#]
_______________
USA
[ 03/26/05
- [Fwd: Google Alert - "marianne labrecque"] ]
RETURN
TO TOP OF PAGE
RETURN
TO HOME PAGE
03/27/05 - Promised just now
[Sorry, _________, was interrupted by
another communication received]
Included here (and, because I probably
will miss some, perhaps some more after):
[Fwd: Please read email and attachment ASAP]
[hyperlink] Ukraine: Leeching the poison?
... of Ukraine's protracted and deeply controversial presidential elections
was
... weeks during the election campaign and that continues to disfigure his
...
www.euractiv.com/
Article?tcmuri=tcm:29-133406-16&type=Analysis
Sending just after this: 09/29/04
- possible neo-Nazi ties
[ 03/26/05
- [Fwd: Google Alert - "marianne labrecque"] ]
RETURN
TO TOP OF PAGE
RETURN
TO HOME PAGE
03/28/05 - Please help [EMPHATIC!!! THIS IS REAL!!!]
I am exhausted!!! But what I am trying to
do impacts all of us tremendously. Please read enough of at least some of what's
here to determine if you agree.
(aw gawd, another communication to get
out!)
where do I start THIS time!????!!
Recent press release:
Google Alert for: "marianne labrecque"
Detainment
of Anti US Slavery Advocate Postponed for Hearing
Emediawire (press release) - Ferndale,WA,USA
(PRWEB) March 26, 2005 -- OCE's recommended 3/11/05 detainment of anti-slavery
activist, Marianne LaBrecque, has been postponed pending a 4/5/05
hearing of ...
c&p from another attempt
Is there any way that your
organization may help in these efforts, if only by simply spidering out
communications in support of the mission outlined in the press release
referenced in what is being forwarded to you?
I represent a number of oppressed
people throughout the world, but came into these efforts by eye witnessing the
abduction into modern-day slavery, here, in the US, of my Love, David, who is
now my fiancé.
I, myself, am now needing support, as
well, against the retaliation to which I am being subjected for speaking out
against these atrocities.
Will we ever return to Kansas again? Is it
still there? Did it ever really exist?
I represent a number of oppressed people
throughout the world, but came into these efforts by eye witnessing the
abduction into modern-day slavery, here, in the US, of my Love, David, who is
now my fiancé.
I, myself, am now needing support, as
well, against the retaliation to which I am being subjected for speaking out
against these atrocities.
Links to all articles I've written are
listed on mykindredspirit2.home.att.net/PressReleases.htm.
Some can also be found by doing a search for my name, Marianne LaBrecque,
through, for example, google.com.
Please understand something that may be
impacting the tone and mechanisms I am using in my activities, as well as the
present condition of the above web site: this persecution is having an impact on
my stamina and possibly my ability to concentrate, and, up until very recently,
there had been indications that I was experiencing the effects of extreme
exhaustion over the course of a three year span, despite my attempts to correct
it.
I will answer any and all concerns you may
have, regarding this. I also realize that I may not be contacting the
appropriate part of your organization for this communication to even have any
effect, but I am hoping that, whoever receives this, will find it in their heart
to relay it to the appropriate person/people.
May Peace (and the end of slavery) Come
Soon!
Marianne LaBrecque
[phone#]
_______________
USA
More, if you have the patience to read
this [ excerpts from recent communications to friends/family/whoever may be
willing to listen]:
...many must be cognizant of what I am
going through right now, and how "natural" it would be for someone
in my situation to be sending as many "message-in-a-bottle" 's as
possible, and otherwise possibly display additional aspects of that type of
desperation....
RETURN
TO TOP OF PAGE
RETURN
TO HOME PAGE
NOTE:
THIS DOES NOT NECESSARILY INCLUDE ALL THE EMAILS
SENT OUT DURING THIS PERIOD
Click
to go to the next group of emails on this site
Click
to go to the previous group of emails on this site
[ Home ]
[ Action Needed! ] [ Today ] [ recent /_\ + /'s ] [ Site Map ] [ q&d site navi ] [ Contact ]
|