|
05/03/04 - CAN'T - LIKE IN NFW - PLEAD IGNORANCE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
To:
Albert Moskowitz <Albert.moskowitz@usdoj.gov>,
"attorney.general@po.state.ct.us" <attorney.general@po.state.ct.us>,
"Brian Reaves, BJS" <Brian.Reaves@usdoj.gov>,
"Chief State's Attorney Christopher L. Morano" <conndcj@po.state.ct.us>,
Dawn Hellier <dawn.hellier@Po.state.ct.us>,
Emmett McGroarty <emcgroarty@acf.hhs.gov>,
FOI - Ramona Saturno <ramona.saturno@Po.state.ct.us>,
Frank Giordano <frank.giordano@po.state.ct.us>,
Henry Lee <forensic.lab@snet.net>,
Interpol's National Central Bureau in Washington <usncb.dispatch.mailbox@usdoj.gov>,
"Jim Morgan, Grant Unit Spvr CT OVC" <james.morgan@jud.state.ct.us>,
Joan Barnes <selpbe@waterfordct.org>,
Laura Lederer <Ledererlj@state.gov>,
Linda Troup <Linda.Troup@usdoj.gov>,
Marsh Bell <Marsh.Bell@usdoj.gov>,
OAS Inter Amer Comm on Human Rights <cidhrela@oas.org>,
Rosemary Budlong <rosemary.budlong@po.state.ct.us>,
United Nations Offc on Drugs & Crime <unodc@unodc.org>,
Wade Hyslop <Wade.Hyslop@po.state.ct.us>
Subject: Forecast: INCREASED VISIBILITY, w/another day; another terrorist attack [at the end]
[text of 05/02/04 - Forecast: INCREASED
VISIBILITY]
for
you to understand some of this
>>>>>>
05/02/04
- another day; another terrorist attack
[text
of 05/02/04
- another day; another terrorist attack]
RETURN
TO TOP OF PAGE
RETURN
TO HOME PAGE
05/02/04 - Forecast: INCREASED VISIBILITY
Part
of what the spg may have got wind of that
motivated the incident relayed in 05/02/04
- another day; another terrorist attack -
probably most of us are now, if only
involuntarily, "attune" to the beat of 10/05/03
- Guns & Roses
- is a
"coalition" milestone effort implemented
on Friday, i.e., 4/30/04, which happened to also
have been the one year anniversary of the My
Kindred Spirit web site. I submitted a press
release that was published on 4/30/04 by a wire
release organization, i.e., something like
Associated Press, except I don't think this one is
as widely known, at least by the general public.
In addition to possibly being pulled for
publication, in part or in it's entirety, by the
media, articles published there may also be used
as a springboard for other journalists' stories.
In
addition, the organization publicizes submissions
on it's web site, as "indy" media, i.e.,
independent media. Yes, they have standards by
which submissions must abide to be accepted, but
it is, basically, a censor free media, at least as
far as the majority of those of us are concerned,
i.e., who are of a civilized culture.
A
summary of each article is published on their web
site. Based on that summary, those visiting that
site may click on the link to the entire article.
The title of the article I submitted, that was
released on 4/30/04, is Government reform
needed to fight U.S. modern-day slavery,
portions of which have appeared in various
community/"coalition" emails. The
summary is as follows:
The
recent publicizing of U.S. slavery omits a great
deal of essential information. Most important is
the failure to publicize the major reasons this
heinous practice has been able to become so
widespread. What's being printed also often
omits a number of points that hamper efforts
such publicizing is intended to achieve: to
create public awareness due to the need for help
in victim identification and rescue, and to
prevent additional victimization. My own
awareness of these shortcomings is through my
experiences after witnessing the August 2002
abduction of David, my main love, who has been
subsequently forced into a sadistic form of
homosexual prostitution and torture. Since then,
I continue learning of additional victims, and
of many aspects of this crime as it is being
carried out in the U.S. today.
Based
on that summary, as of tonight, 5/2/04 at 11:59
p.m., here are the statistics: 10,981/73/1/4
#
of times the press release was accessed, i.e.,
clicked on the link to the entire article from
that site: 10,981
#
of times the press release was picked up by a
media outlet (does not tell how many times the
story appears in the media but represents an
enhanced interest in the story by a media
outlet: 73
#
of times the press release was forwarded to a
third party: 1
#
of times someone has printed the press release,
measured by the number of times that the
"printer friendly version" link is
pressed - the organization says that, in
reality, only a small percentage of users
actually click this link before printing a
release: 4
Yes,
I am very concerned about what this type of
exposure may mean to David's safety and the other
victims. But something has to be done to push
efforts to get them rescued.
On
the other hand, what this may most possibly also
mean is that the spg will become the poster child
of hated U.S. domestic terrorists. This exposure
may also result in any crime syndicate to have
been unfortunate enough to let the spg connect
with it to feel the same as many other of us feel,
i.e., sorry to have ever allowed this scum to have
ever entered our lives!
Here's
the link to the article: www.prweb.com/releases/Apr%20/0/prweb122283.htm
What
this means is that, even if I am killed by having
been spun around and thrown in front of an
oncoming car, and even if they may stage it in a
way in which it may be said that it is because I
was drinking so much [fill in the blanks] and even
if they had pre-arranged the supplying of
"witnesses" of what "really
happened" = or
else!
THE
BALL IS ALREADY IN MOTION!!!!!
When
are these pathetically stupid sociopaths going to
wake up and smell the coffee? When are they going
to realize that everything they are doing is being
watched? When are they going to realize that,
after all of this other evidence that they have
stupidly so arrogantly provided, NO ONE is going
to believe that the people who they've been so
flagrantly marketing and abusing just
"can't be located" because they are
"homeless" or "have moved to
Mexico" or are "traveling across the
country in a van" or have "moved to
Atlanta, GA" because they have arranged to
have people see the victims standing in front of a
packed van - or
else!
and that those victims were
been TOLD to say that that's what they were doing
- or
else!
or
even arranged for victims to write, like in their
own handwriting, postcards - or
else!
and
had them sent from the place that they've had
people spread stories of these victims being, - or
else!
or
even possibly have someone log onto a victim's
email account and sent emails that, for those
unenlightened, may appear to be an email from one
of the victims - or
else!
?????????
When
are these scum.... opps, sorry...... these
"stupid sociopaths" going to realize
that the only thing that will save
THEIR
asses from getting even sorrier
is
for them to actually start releasing victims -
better yet, all at once - and in the area in which
this will be best "understood."
05/03/04
- 12:35 pm: 11,045/73/1/4
RETURN
TO TOP OF PAGE
RETURN
TO HOME PAGE
05/02/04 - another day; another terrorist attack
Yes,
it's getting to be that it's not even
"newsworthy" any more, at least not for
these emails, at least not for me. And it's not
that it is something I've consciously decided.
It's just, I guess I've become so used to what
most probably are terrorist attacks, that I don't
even think of including them in one of these
emails.
And
that's what would have happened with the one last
night. But, especially after it was also possibly
followed with another attack a few hours later,
and, if so, considerably closer to home, perhaps
that's what made me realize that I HAVEN'T been
sending the terrorist alerts/whatever out that
SHOULD possibly be going out.
So
here's what happened last night, as I was about to
cross the street to my car:
The
group of people at the end of the building started
to rush toward me, when they saw me, seeming to
recognize me. They seemed to be acting as though
they either had something they wanted to tell me
or just were... greeting me????? I don't think I
recognized any of them, but that doesn't mean
anything these days. One of them reached me before
the others, a tall man with blondish hair.
Everything happened so quickly that I'm not sure
of some of this. He may have reached for me before
I said anything, or I may have said something
like, "Oh, I need a hug," another thing
that isn't so uncommon these days..... whatever.
Anyway,
he put his arms around my body, including my arms,
lifted me so that my feet were off the ground, and
started spinning me around. As soon as I realized
he was going to spin me, I probably started to
tell him not to do that to me. I remember trying
to grab him, to get him to listen, but, again, my
arms were pinned. I don't even remember if my body
was facing him or he had me from the back. Later,
when I tried to remember what he looked like, I
remembered that, at one point I got a flash of his
face with a very serious and sinister expression
on it. That may have been just as he lifted me or
when I finally broke free from him.
He
must have spun me around at least ten times. I
know that it was the most I've ever been spun - at
least since I was a little kid - probably because
I can usually manage to stop someone just as
they're starting, such as on the rare occasions
I've agreed to jitterbug with someone. I don't
spin well AT ALL, and try to avoid situations when
that may even happen, which is why I rarely agree
to jitterbug with someone, and, even then, usually
tell them, before we even start, "No
spinning, though!"
Last
night, I think I managed to get a foot against
something solid when he spun me close to the steps
of the building. That's when I was able to break
loose from him and was going to run back into the
building. But he grabbed my arm and swung me
around to the street, perhaps saying something
like, "No. You're going [or were going] this
way." I don't know if he shoved me. I was
trying to overcome the effects of the spinning
but, for me, it's like still not having my feet on
the ground, in addition to making me extremely
faint. I tried to put my other foot down to get my
balance and I was being projected to the street. I
saw a car coming and was trying to stop my body
from reaching the street. I just collapsed on the
ground, my body falling sideways, I guess, or
twisted. The area of my body between my hip and
the side of my butt hit the edge of the concrete
curb and the side of my face and one or both of my
elbows hit the street. I tried to lift my head, I
think, but hadn't recovered yet enough to do so.
It
was probably the others, who evidently had now
caught up with where we were, who were around me. I remember vaguely wondering if they were going to
do anything else to me. I just saw their feet around me.
Someone put my pocketbook in front of me or handed
it to me. I remember clutching it close to my head
or face. Someone thrust a hand in front of my
downward facing face, possibly as I was struggling
to get up. My white cigarette lighter was in his
hand. Someone - I don't think the same person -
either grabbed my arm to try to lift me or gave me
a hand to grab to help me get up. I heard a woman
say, "She almost [or could have] got hit by a
car."
I
became aware that someone I knew must have come
out of the building and was, also, trying to help
me up, or perhaps that was the same person who'd
try to help when I was still on the ground. He was
asking me if I was okay. Then, when I was
standing, he was telling me to be careful, because
there were police around.
He
said, "It must have been all that red wine
you were drinking." As I struggled to reach
the side of the building, so that I could hold
onto something until the spinning stopped, I
explained to him, "I wasn't even drinking red
wine. It's because he was spinning me [or I got
spun] around. The person who probably arranged for
what happened just now was someone who had
associated with me for 18 years and is very aware
of what spinning does to me. These people were
probably just told to do it, not knowing what it
would do to me."
I've
been trying all day to remember some of the times
heively commented on the effects of spinning and
my particularly extreme intolerance for it. It may
have been during a video we were watching of the
Holocaust, in which someone was spun around by a
group of men, I think it was, and it caused
something terrible to happen to the man. I'm not
remembering all of it right now, although I'm sure
it will eventually all come back to me. I think
that that was the time, or one of the times, that
hively explained what spinning can do to someone,
and about something he'd read about training for
astronauts that includes spinning, and that some
people can't handle spinning at all. That was
probably when I gave him information about myself
that I shouldn't: I told him about my intolerance
for spinning, etc.. Again, these people use every
bit of information they can get. hiveley always
like to keep reminding me of all he knew about me.
And
no, I will not risk another false arrest by
reporting this spinning incident.
Oh,
yeah. What are the chances that the one person who
happened to have reached me first was also tall
enough and strong enough to, apparently,
effortlessly lift the 5'5" and 160-165 lbs of
me off the ground, as I was struggling, and spin
me around as though I were made of paper? And what
are the chances that, say, he did this because he
perhaps had more to drink than he should have,
that he would have still been able to withstand
the spinning he, himself was having to do as he
was spinning me? Any statisticians out there?
RETURN
TO TOP OF PAGE
RETURN
TO HOME PAGE
05/03/04 - D+ [modified]
The
re-structured web site will probably be uploaded
by the end of the week. Most of the changes are
the breaking up of the one large Email Archive
page into separate pages for each month. This will
considerably decrease the "slow pages"
and the length of time it's been taking to access
that Email Archive page.
However,
the current single page enables downloading and/or
printing all of the emails in the Email Archive to
be done in only one step. Anyone who wants to do
so, who hasn't, should do so now, before this page
is broken down into the too high a number of
months since Dave's abduction.
A
handful of September and October 2002 emails that
hadn't previously been included on the web site,
are also being added. Other pages of the web site
may also be broken down, or will later, as time
allows.
RETURN
TO TOP OF PAGE
RETURN
TO HOME PAGE
05/04/04 - DAVID'S IN THAT BURNING BUILDING!!!!!!!!!!!
DAVID'S
IN THAT BURNING BUILDING!!!!!!!!!!!
PLEASE
PLEASE PLEASE PLE
CAN'T
YOU UNDERSTAND ?
aND
DAVE IS NOT THE ONLY ONE
AND
THE OTHERS ARE NOT ONLY PEOPLE WHO ARE DEAR TO ME,
IF ONLY BECAUSE MANY OF THEM FELL VICTIM IN TRYING
TO HELP IN THESE EFFORTS. THESE ARE PEOPLE WHO ARE
IMPORTANT TO MANY OTHERS. NOT THAT THOSE OTHERS
DON'T RECOGNIZE THAT THEY ARE IMPORTANT TO THEM.
IT'S JUST THAT THEY MAY HAVE NOT YET RECOGNIZED
THEM AS "VICTIMS" ! ! ! !
BUT
THE BUILDING IS ON FIRE AND THERE IS NO TIME FOR
ALL OF THAT S____!!!!!!
WHAT
LANGUAGE NEEDS TO BE SPOKEN TO GET A RESPONSE TO
THIS ALARM?
AM
I THE ONLY ONE WHO WILL NOT TOLERATE EVEN ONE OF
THESE PRECIOUS LIVES TO BE LOST?
PLEASE
I
KNOW THAT I AM NOT THE ONLY ONE TO WHOM THESE
PEOPLE ARE IMPORTANT.
WHAT
IIIISSSSSSSS IT THAT HAS TO HAPPEN HERE????
RETURN
TO TOP OF PAGE
RETURN
TO HOME PAGE
05/05/04 - competition/compensation
Something
from long ago keeps coming back to me over and
over and over again:
It's
something that happened well over 10 years ago. It
was a work situation in which I was involved -
yeah, like in the days when people were actually
paid to do the work that is most needed - or what
we all thought was most needed. But, anyway, we
got money for doing ethical things.
My
position was officially called "Manager of
Wage and Salary" but, even in those days,
would have been called "Compensation
Manager" in a more "current"
organization. Even that would be a misnomer,
though. I don't know if what I was doing in that
position was the same as my predecessor's but my
responsibility was for the entire compensation and
performance management of all employees of that
organization. No, this did not cover those
"employees" whose compensation was
negotiated with, and solely on the approval of,
the board of directors. For those, my
responsibility was to research and submit
proposals to the board. And yes, even of those
employees whose compensation and performance
management I was responsible, it was pretty much
the same, in that I'd submit proposals, based on
research and analysis I'd done, but which required
Executive Committee approval.
Anyway,
the thing/whatever that keeps coming back to me is
- it was most probably a meeting called together
to critique/discuss/get feedback on what I had
proposed for the next fiscal year, before it went
to budget. And there is a good chance that I had
proposed the meeting. However, although I may have
stipulated who should be invited to attend, which
I believe I did, i.e., first line supervisors and
managers of certain departments, the meeting was
probably organized by the assistant to the Sr. VP
to whom I reported. I ordinarily would have
reported to a Director of the Personnel/Human
Resource Department, but that position was
probably vacant by the time this meeting was held.
And,
yes, I ordinarily would have organized the meeting
myself, since I had no staff, but, on things such
as this, that had potential high small
"p," but, even though only lower, upper
case "p," political overture in an
individual organizational environment, it probably
had called for me presenting a strong defense to
have just received approval to have the meeting
called, and would have, thereby, called for the
assistant of the person arranging that approval to
arrange the actual meeting.
It
was a "luncheon meeting," the kind of
thing that would be held to allow those whose
routine work was often so demanding that they
could not, ordinarily, attend, let alone provide
any input, in things such as "task
force" efforts, etc., during "normal
business hours" other than during their lunch
break. No, that's not how I happened to have been
there. Part of my job required me to be at any
related meetings, regardless of what other ____
was on my plate.
We
were talking about recruitment and retention
efforts of "lower level" positions,
i.e., record clerks, dietary aids (food preparers
and deliverers), housekeeping, receptionist/unit
clerks, etc., or any of those who, otherwise,
answer/screen/"direct" and/or disconnect
callers, etc.. And, in fact, that it WAS a
"luncheon meeting" in this particular
organization, as well as some other things about
it I vaguely recall, it leads me to think that the
meeting may have been specifically addressing only
such "lower level" positions.
I
would have been explaining the basis of my
proposals: being a long established
"community" organization, and this being
just, just before the late '80's, early 90's
recession, we had a good retention rate,
particularly in these positions. ( I would present
the percentage figure.) What that meant, however,
was that we had a number of people in positions
within their job classification who were at the
maximum of the pay range assigned to that job
class. ( I would present the percentage figure.)
Being
at that "max" meant that the only pay
increase for which they were qualified was,
ordinarily, only a cost of living (COL)
adjustment. And a COL adjustment was basically
only that.
Another
adjustment for which they would qualify was a
"market adjustment," which is one in
which the pay scale and/or correlating range is
adjusted to what is being paid in the rest of the
market for the same job. What I would propose
would be within a 5% adjustment over the market
average.
Something
I would not have entirely relayed in such
communications is that, in the position in which I
was, I needed to base my proposals on where this
particular organization told me it wanted to be,
competitively, which was that it wanted to be, but
not exceed more than, 5% above the average of
market rates. So, for example, it didn't want to
surpass market rates. And I totally agreed with
that strategy because, following these guidelines
they provided to me, this would enable us to
remain competitive without doing so much to feed
inflation. (At this time, the labor market was
highly competitive, and it was an industry in
which it's usually highly competitive, anyway.)
A
great deal of the basis of what I proposed was the
other part of my role, i.e., performance
management. I felt it should be the driver of
proposals of that other side of my role, i.e.,
compensation. This was the basis of my defense of
proposals to the Executive Committee, which,
again, would be the deciding authority in any of
this.
So,
particularly for people in these "lower
level" positions, most were at the max of
their pay range and also, most often, were not
qualified to transfer to positions of "upward
mobility." Yet those people would not qualify
for a "performance adjustment,"
regardless of the quality of their performance,
because they were already in the maximum of their
range.
Aside
from my role in this position, I also personally
feel that performance evaluation is critical from
both the organization's standpoint as well as that
of the individual employee. Yet, at least in this
organization and at that time, contrary to stated
organization policy, performance evaluations were
usually not being done for employees already at
max ( I would present the percentage figure.)
unless it was to justify the firing of someone for
extremely unacceptable performance.
Because
of this, one of the "unprecedented' proposals
I'd made was to expand the range of wage scales
for job classes in which the retention rate was a
particular percentage or higher. Despite the fact
that the pay packages that I proposed, during the
2 years I was there were unprecedented in that
organization, almost all of what I'd proposed had
been approved. Yes, it was probably always after
much needed expounding and defense of their basis
on my part, and with a very supportive Sr. VP, who
did HIS compensation analysis from the information
he'd get in his conversations in the corridors and
who was usually in sync with, and equally
supportive of, the possible need for interim
adjustments during the fiscal year, in addition to
the annual package, of which I would be aware
through painstaking number crunching.
This
was the type of spiel I was most probably spieling
out at that luncheon meeting, responding to
questions and concerns, and listening for input,
particularly that relating to a departure that was
being proposed from what they'd been used to
having.
But
one of the supervisors stopped me dead in my
tracks, probably or just after I'd identified the
entities that had been used in peer comparison.
Again, the woman stopped me dead in my tracks with
something like, "What all that research and
analysis you've done is not considering is that
what we may be competing against is what these
people may be paid by drug dealers." Yes,
however she phrased it, it was very clear that
what she was referring to was the illegal drug
industry.
Yes,
I was even more naive then than I am now, or even
2 years before now. My response was something
like, "Well, that's not the type of person we
would want to attract or retain here,
anyway." She just looked at me, without
commenting further. And I don't think I ever
pursued getting more of an explanation from her,
probably just due to time constraints on both our
parts.
I
think it's only now, after all these years since,
that I've stopped to consider that what she may
have referring to was that it may make it more
likely for "that type of person" to be
working for both at the same time. [About a year
or so later, after I'd already been "relieved
of my duties there," a pharmacist employed by
that organization was convicted of selling
controlled drugs in the "uncontrolled
market."]
But
even now - as anyone may surmise from reading,
say, the article that was released last Friday,
4/30/04, I still feel that performance management
for the purpose of quality assurance, i.e.,
effective policies, procedures, management,
monitoring and supervisory practices, is one of
the key ingredients lacking in what has
contributed to this rampant epidemic that has
taken so many of our loved ones victim. [Dave,
Love of mine, are you listening? and do you
realize how much I need you? (The following was
written before this was) Dave? Dave? Dave, David
Love, please please, whoever, please make this be
over soon
]
If,
so long ago, we were starting to see the
possibility of the illegal narcotics trade
infiltrating our licit operations, why are so many
still apparently refusing to even entertain the
possibility of slavery, including sexual
exploitation, syndicates infiltrating government
and as many other licit operations that they
possibly can?
And,
yeah, how many of us can say today that we get
money for doing ethical things? And how many can
say something that's just the opposite?
RETURN
TO TOP OF PAGE
RETURN
TO HOME PAGE
05/05/04 - glad it is a cold miserable spring!
Yes,
Dave, it hurts so much to realize that this is the
third spring in a row that these sleaze have kept
you from seeing here, from before they even took
you into their total claws
and
of course that in addition to all the other
horror, absolute, incomprehensible horror that
they've wrecked on our lives and the lives of so
many others
but
the third spring, when we already knew the number
we'd have together would be so few
I'm
realizing, as I say what I'm about to say, that
their terrorism may result in
"uncharacteristic behavior" in all of
us:
I hope that each of them are made to
experience each of the horrors they've caused each
of you - not only you, Dave - to have experienced
and
I hope that they get to pay at least a month for
every day that they made this continue
I
can go on, but that would border on sadism in
itself
David,
I long so much for a kiss, to give you a kiss
and
I already am prepared to deal with the fact that,
this year, we will not be able to see each other
on your birthday
although
I may get a second wind, I don't think I will be
going out tonight, as much as I wanted to get to
Mystic for cinco de mayo. but I'm still feeling
the effects of the fall that I took Saturday
night. It seems to have taken a lot out of me -
for tonight
but
perhaps just a 20 minute nap is all I need.
RETURN
TO TOP OF PAGE
RETURN
TO HOME PAGE
05/06/04 - candle in the wind?
oh
yeah?!!!
and
where does that leave you, "good" ol'
boys (gals)?
you
don't even know who(s) watching every little f ---
move you make!
RETURN
TO TOP OF PAGE
RETURN
TO HOME PAGE
05/06/04 - smoke from the candle
BTW - an ad hoc report generated by the SNEASC knowledge base points to Angela Daughtry as being the person who most probably chose that particular
song.
RETURN
TO TOP OF PAGE
RETURN
TO HOME PAGE
05/07/04 (posted as) - where the dreams that you dare to dream really do come true - an allegory
No,
Love, you know I didn't forget that it was your
birthday. If you were able to get word of it, you
would have realized that from an email from a few
days ago, although I don't know if it was one that
was put on the web site.
but
the wicked witch of west mystic is still up to her
dastardly way of thinking ("yeah,. I was in
love once - I was in love with a red
pocketbook")
Town
was particularly empty tonight, even though it had
been particularly crowded this time last week.
Tonight it was the way it suddenly was for a while
after I passed word to the spg that the fact that
I had a possible six year prison term, due to the
last two false arrests they orchestrated against
me, meant that I had carte blanche at requesting
or subpoenaing anyone and anything in relation to
this situation. And, low and behold, suddenly a
number of people were no longer around.
Perhaps
that's what it takes for them to feel as though
they are safe.
But,
anyway, as you've possibly surmised, I purposely
kept the fact that it was you birthday relatively
quiet in the dream that that may increase the
chance of us seeing each other.
I
also realize, though, that the conditions under
which they are keeping you may leave you unaware
of dates of the year. (yes, there is more that I
wanted to say/relay to you, but I'm falling
asleep.)
David,
just keep thinking, as I do, of all of these
celebrations that the spg has specifically denied
us, that we will celebrate once these sleaze have
had to relinquish you from their hold.
RETURN
TO TOP OF PAGE
RETURN
TO HOME PAGE
05/08/04 - An Interesting Article About Police Corruption and Reform
An
Interesting Article About Police Corruption and
Reform: May 8, 2004. 08:20 AM, Toronto Star, Police
scandals often more than `bad apples' Tough to
clean own house, expert says
www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar/Layout/Article_Type1&c=Article&cid=1083967809627&call_
pageid=968332188492&col=968793972154
RETURN
TO TOP OF PAGE
RETURN
TO HOME PAGE
05/08/04 - who taught/is teaching this media how to talk???!!!!
www.palmbeachpost.com/localnews/content/auto/epaper/editions/saturday/south_county_04c925c7371d524100d5.html
>
quote: "But while the existence of human
trafficking is well known, there is no state law
specifically making it illegal."
This
type of thing is being said repeatedly,
particularly in states that are now passing laws
against human trafficking with watered down
sentences of that mandated at the federal level.
Is
it only because I may be biased, due to what has
and is happening to Dave and way too many other
friends, supporters and other victims I know
personally, that I am reading something else in
this, in between the lines, or is it that either
this media thinks that the general U.S. public is
that gullible or that it really is?
RETURN
TO TOP OF PAGE
RETURN
TO HOME PAGE
05/10/04 - so much to remember
Yes,
I'm still working on the restructuring of the web
site. Part of it is due to a format change that I
decided to make after almost all the pages were
almost already through that particular phase. But,
even without that, it's pretty tedious and other
things still have to be kept up in between.
My
sleep pattern is changing back again to more of
what Dave's may be. I keep working until I fall
asleep at the computer, but that's been getting
later and later and didn't even happen yet for
this last night that went by. But, then again, on
Saturday, for example, I didn't get to bed until
about 10:15 am (unless that was yesterday) and
ended up sleeping until 3:15 in the afternoon. No,
not my usual. In fact, I don't think I've ever
done that, except for times when I was very sick.
But I had been short on sleep, sooo.
Going
over those emails again is most painful.
Everything has been recounted so many times,
between the emails and reports that I've had to do
for various entities, that, except for the
portions that I've had to repeat so often that I
can almost manage to do numbed to the pain, I've
probably begun relaying them, without always letting
what I am saying really penetrate my
mind as often.
It's
bad enough missing David so much and worrying,
knowing so much of what he's experiencing yet not
knowing all.
April
30th marked one year that the
"temporary" web site has been set up.
Today marks the timing of the "EMT
incident." Friday was Dave's birthday.
Thursday marks one year that we've been deprived
of even seeing or speaking to one another. Next
week is our second anniversary of the pact that we
made with each other.
Having
to go over those emails is like living all the
hurt, again, that's in addition to all that,
although I know it should be done, if only just to
make the site more user friendly in speed.
It
is still startling to recall how incredibly cruel
so many people, relatively speaking, have been.
It's still unbelievable that people can be this
sickly and sickeningly cruel. And no, what is
coming out regarding the abuses in Iraq has not
been surprising to me, nor probably to the many
other people who have been made well aware of what
has been done to people like Dave right here on
our own soil. And how authorities have behaved in
all of this.
I
like to think that at least some of this will be
ending soon. But reading the May emails of last
year reminded me that I was thinking the same way
then. But that was before the corruption of our
infrastructure was made so evident to me.
I
still believe what I tried to get passed on to
Dave in some emails that didn't go on the web site
and were not part of even the "general
circulation" emails. They were sent out in
the middle of March. Hopefully someone was kind
enough to relay them to Dave, if that was even
possible:
Some
things that are happening that help bring timing
into better sync:
And
I relayed a number of things that may make that
so.
But
none of this is really that important if Dave is
still being held, and particularly what he is
having to endure while all of this other takes
place. I just don't know what else to do right
now. I am optimistic, though. It's just that
it's taking so long.
But,
unlike last year, when the "EMT
incident" emerged just days after I'd told
Dave the same I am saying now, this year the
possible positive developments relayed in that
email of March of this year were a number of them,
as opposed to that of last year's being merely the
possible impact of having set up the web site. And
the ones relayed in that March 2004 email had all
emerged within a month of what was said in the 02/23/04
- allowing time to perk email:
Love,
don't forget what I've said. Don't forget the
promise that we've made. Yes, I wish I had a lot
more wisdom than I do, and definitely wish I had a
lot more information and cooperation than I do,
but please keep your faith in me. People believe
what's happening. Again, remember that they know a
great deal more about it than I do. So, no, that's
not the issue and I think you realized a while
back that it isn't. I think, by now, even if you
didn't before, you probably now know where the
real problems lie. But there are other things that
are happening nationally, politically, activistly,
etc. that perhaps are bringing timing into better
sync. Let's hope, at least.
And
Dave, if you are able to read this email today,
you may also know that I have been putting a lot
of weight on the exposure of the article relayed a week ago yesterday in 05/02/04
- Forecast: INCREASED VISIBILITY and, if you
have heard, I know that you . . . well we both do.
Early yesterday morning, I sent out the following
to the tech department that supplies the
statistics described in that email - I had just
seen the stats:
3:46 am: 25,948 /138/1/4:
Are
these figures legitimate or are there things
that hype them up, such as PRWeb staff accessing
the articles to build the stats to be higher?
I
don't mean to question your integrity, i.e., the
integrity of PRWeb, but I am pointing to these
stats to an extremely terrorized community, as
to the fact that there seems to be other people
in the U.S./world who may be watching what is
happening here. The sense of security that they
may get from that may impact the additional risk
that people here are willing to take to get us
out of this situation. What you may not realize,
particularly if you have not researched the
situation behind that article, tracking number
122283, is that there may be people's lives at
stake/put in danger here, either that of
current/potential victims or
"informants." (Too much to explain in
this communication.)
But
that is why the answer of this question is so
critical.
We
are a relatively small community. However, what
are reportedly the two largest gambling casinos
in the world, Foxwoods and Mohegan Sun, have
sprung up in our midst in a little over the last
10 years. In addition, we also happen to house a
number of potential world terrorist targets.
Yes,
this is all like something from some science
fiction movie. But it is very real. In fact, if
you get on the mykindredspirit.home.att.net web
site that has been set up regarding this, and if
you were to go to the Today page and read the
email, "05/02/04
- another day; another terrorist attack"
you will learn what happened to me the day after
that article was released. No, the email does
not relay the total horror nor potential danger
to my life of that incident and, no, only the
next email, "05/02/04
- Forecast: INCREASED VISIBILITY,"
relays the possible tie of one to another. And
you would have to have followed the emails of
that site, all > 250 pages of them, and/or
have first hand experience in what is happening
here, to understand the possible connection. (If
you were to read "10/05/03
- Guns & Roses" on the Email/Archive page of
that site, you may gain some understanding). But
there is real and significant danger here, not
only to myself but also to others in our
community. But I think many/most of us here
realize that we have to expose ourselves to
enemy fire in order to try to get the outside
help we so desperately need.
May
peace "on the homefront" come soon.
(The home page of the web site explains some of
that.)
So,
how much weight should be put on these
"quick stats"? Are they legit?
And,
just before I began writing this email, I logged
on and saw the reply:
Yes,
these stats are legit. The represent the number
of times that your release was accessed from all
measurable points on our network. This means
that your acctual number is actually higher.
Current
stats, 5/10/04, (I'm going to have to reboot to
get them) okay, here they are at
8:22
am: 27,836
/ 154 / 1 / 4
Dave,
again:
I
hope you are allowed to be in an alert enough
state to read and comprehend this. I hope that
you are given enough time of your own to have,
at least, seen it. I hope that you have been
given the opportunity and the freedom to have
seen it. I hope that you are at least being kept
safe enough to make it through the night each
night and to make it through the day each day. .
. . . . . .
RETURN
TO TOP OF PAGE
RETURN
TO HOME PAGE
05/11/04 - Foresight needed
[INCREASED
VISIBILITY as of today 12:13 pm: 29,591/177/1/4]
The
April/May 2003 "Urgent" email is one
that was mentioned a great deal in other emails,
for a while, after it went out. It also marked a
milestone in these efforts in the type of appeal
it was to the community and the method in which it
was disseminated.
Although
I don't have the exact figures nor breakdown right
in front of me, I think that the original version
of URGENT PUBLIC ACTION NEEDED, the one of
4/15/03, was sent out to possibly 30 recipients
who hadn't been previously alerted to this
situation by me, including a few local businesses.
Eventually, between that time and about 5/2/03, a
version of URGENT was sent out to between probably
200 and 300 recipients.
If
I recall - and it may be in my journal - first
getting that out on 4/15/03 may have been what
finally led me to decide to set up the web site at
the end of April 2003. It may have been that one
of the versions of URGENT was the original home
page of the site but URGENT was eventually removed
from the web site as a separate page and was never
added to the list of emails.
This
morning, I reviewed it again, to see if it should
possibly be added back onto the site. Does reading
it today, just over a year later, have the same
effect on others? Where will we be this time next
year?
The
following is the first, the shortest, version of
the "URGENT" communication.
04/15/03
- URGENT PUBLIC ACTION NEEDED
Please
understand that the reason such an unusual action
as this is being taken is because this is a truly
desperate situation. It is being sent to you as
part of the effort to increase public awareness of
the "possible" (see material for why
this is phrased in this way) heavily camouflaged
plight of Dave _________ and "possibly"
some of my other friends. Public outcry is needed
to adequately push federal officials to take
IMMEDIATE action.
As
long as we allow all that's involved here to
continue, it will only expand and snare other
victims, especially with the increased demand for
them created by the casinos and other marketing
venues, as well as the rewards these activities
bring. And the longer it is allowed to continue,
the more money will accumulate through the
exploitation of these victims and possibly other
illicit activities. That money, in turn, can be
used to make it even more difficult to
"reach" these victims, and allow the
people exploiting them to expand their operations,
increase the demand for more victims and pay for
additional cover-up.
The
public also needs to become aware of what I,
myself, have learned in the eight months that I
have been trying to resolve this. That is that the
mechanisms we all thought were in place to protect
people against such horrors aren't really there
or, if some are, they don't work. Because of this
situation, it becomes even easier for "people
of low integrity" to get away with this type
of thing.
Members
of our community need to try to understand the
role they may be inadvertently playing in the
dynamics that allowed such horror to develop, in
the first place, right under our noses, and that
allows it to continue and grow. Those who know
ANYTHING about these activities need to talk about
them, and those who don't know anything about
these activities should become aware of them. In
the course of doing so, hopefully, those people,
may also, as I did, come to the the realization
that there are members of the community who are
frightened, are afraid to talk about certain
things, afraid to admit that they've seen, heard,
read or thought certain things, . . . . afraid not
to do what certain people tell them they must do.
Hopefully, they will also realize what effect all
this is having on the fate of my friends and other
possible current and future victims. They will
most probably see that our community is,
basically, being terrorized by a "gang"
of people doing very, very bad things to other
people and, most possibly, coercing others to go
along with those activities because those other
people may feel that, unless they go along with
this "gang", the same bad things will
happen to them or a loved one.
Members
of the public need to realize that, unless they
help in this, there may eventually come a time
when they, themselves, "decipher" that
their niece or nephew, or son or daughter, or
fiancé or spouse - someone very, very dear to
them . . . just as in the situation here - has
also now become a victim of something like this,
and even perhaps now with whom they are not able
to associate nor even see, as is this case with me
and at least one of the other "possible"
victim's loved one, while knowing, or worse, not
knowing what danger that person is in nor how much
they may be suffering. There may possibly come a
time when they may be deciphering many others who
have possibly fallen victim to similar situations.
But they will have no way to bring any of those
victims to safety and "actual" freedom
because there are no effective mechanisms in place
to do so and there is so much money and power,
building as we speak, supporting these activities.
There
is no more time for either "lip
service," excuses nor cover-up activities by
authorities. The proof's in the PUDDING!! These
people are still being held against their will and
being terrorized into doing and saying things to
help mask their own horrible situation. Eight
months have gone by. These are people's lives!
Please
help in making the public aware of this situation,
if only by sharing the information contained in
the what follows. If you are willing to do so, and
especially if you are willing to do even more to
favorably resolve this situation, I thank you.
Sincerely,
Marianne
LaBrecque
Waterford,
CT
P.S.
- I've also attached a response to a possible
reaction to this material, i.e. excerpts of an
email sent out 02/01/03
- I'm a lunatic. Feel free to reprint any of
this material and/or to forward it to others.
[
This was also followed by the BATTLE
ON THE HOMEFRONT image, artwork flyer text and
artwork
description, that are now currently on the home
page of the web site..]
RETURN
TO TOP OF PAGE
RETURN
TO HOME PAGE
05/13/04 - Communication breakdown
Traveling
along the overpasses and underpasses of
governmental headquarters and similar entities,
it's always amazing to still see
scarecrows&cowardly lions, i.e., those who,
although otherwise apparently quite intelligent,
claim or behave as though, for example, mid level
technology such as relational databases are
"scary" and, even at the IT level, claim
to not be able to comprehend, for example, that if
an email is returned "from" the intended
destination server, it did in fact get there. In
addition, if there is no record of that
communication in the file that is indicated as
being the "Final-Recipient" it means
that something happened to that communication at
that server's end. And, particularly if it is a
server through which highly sensitive information
may pass, such an incident should be seen as
evidence of a possible security leak and, yes,
warrants concern to which "I have more
important things to do" is not an appropriate
response.
Further,
when this occurs, if there has been a pattern of
administrative staff of such organizations
instructing a potential sender to, instead, send a
communication to an email account to which that
administrative staff member has access, to
circumvent this "problem," of which it
is being said from the recipient's end, "I
don't know why that happened," or even, as
also is possibly an emerging pattern,
administrative staff of such an entity instructing
a potential sender to "cc" that
administrative staff member so that "in case
anything happens, I'll make sure that [he or she]
gets it" or the person to whom the caller has
been directed, "explaining" that that
person is the target recipient's
"assistant," the "assistant"
blatantly and emphatically stating that the
"cc" is because that
"assistant" likes to be kept informed of
all that goes to the target recipient, and, when
the caller/potential sender refuses to send the
communication to the "assistant" versus
the target recipient, insists on a promise of that
"cc" before relinquishing information of
the required actual email address.
etc.,
etc., etc., something along the lines of the
"new person" in the record department of
local level police departments, as relayed in 07/31/03
- yeah, nice - but this is the reality.
What
makes this scenery even more interesting is that
these are entities that, one would think, would be
particularly attune to the fact that, given the
current environment, such episodes do, in fact,
warrant suspicion of being indication of possible
infiltration by terrorists and/or other organized
crime or, in the very least, that SOMETHING isn't
kosher! Or do they need the wiz to explain that to
them?
RETURN
TO TOP OF PAGE
RETURN
TO HOME PAGE
05/14/04 - Rumfeld's new boots
I
read parts of today's newspaper before going to
bed this morning. Yes, my thoughts are constantly
of Dave, but the current news headlines of abuses
in Iraq and the position U.S. authorities are
taking in it just drills David's horror and
situation deeper into my consciousness, if that is
possible. One of the many, many, many twerpy
ironies/coincidences that have occurred throughout
the time in which Dave and I have been subjected
to the terrorism of the spg, from even before
Dave's abduction into their total custody, is that
the story of atrocities in Iraq finally made front
page news, in our area anyway, the day after the
4/30/04 release of the Government
reform needed to fight U.S. modern-day slavery
article. (see 05/02/04
- Forecast: INCREASED VISIBILITY )
Today's
front page article is just an example of those headlines, Rumsfeld:
Abuse ‘Will Not Happen Again' -Secretary Travels
To Notorious Iraqi Prison, Denies Cover-up, by
ROBERT BURNS, published on 5/14/2004 by the New
London Day. As horrible as those atrocities of
detainees in Iraq that are being depicted, and even
additional information of even worse "bad
things" that will most probably be finally
publicized (reference today's article, "Rumsfeld
... said “more bad things will come out,
unquestionably,” but did not elaborate.")
what is happening here, right in our local area,
to Dave and to other victims, is so much worse,
including the role that authorities are playing in
it.
No,
no, no, no way can they EVER plead ignorance. Just
only some of the proof of that is in 09/18/03
- Stonington CAN'T plead IGNORANCE! and 05/03/04
- CAN'T - LIKE IN NFW - PLEAD
IGNORANCE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (yes, some of those
emails were returned due to invalid/no longer
valid email addresses.) And, in the 05/03/04 email
to those authorities, which, again, included the
text of Forecast:
INCREASED VISIBILITY followed by the
text of 05/02/04
- another day; another terrorist attack, there
was some additional communication that preceded
those paste-ins that, if recipients have any heart
and any brain, given their previous awareness of
this situation, and if they are not too cowardly to
see, hear and feel such things, they may
understand how some of us can truly relate to how
the loved ones of those detainees must feel, as
well as the outrage that the people of Iraq have
displayed.
Extracted
from that article:
"Hoping
to contain a spreading scandal, Defense
Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld ... insisted the
Pentagon did not try to cover up abuses there.
Does
this sound familiar? Perhaps the committee
investigating this situation in Iraq should review
emails on the My Kindred Spirit web site such as:
03/11/04 - there are mountains to be moved [modified]
09/11/03
- ACCOUNTABILITY
09/30/03
- Beaming up the infrastructure
04/27/03
- Dysfunctional Infrastructure, part 1
05/09/03
- (DEFINITELY! ! !) DYSFUNCTIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE, PART 2
12/09/03
- Should "hearts" be banned? > Totally Dysfunctional Infrastructure
and
perhaps even
05/23/03
- Dysfunctional Infrastructure Pt3
or
even
03/18/04 - local & state law enforcement not responsible for reporting federal law violations?
"A
top general with him said he had given clear
guidelines months ago on the humane way to
question Iraqi prisoners.
And
that should be taken as quality management,
relatively speaking. Not being facetious. Evidence
uncovered in the efforts here point to the fact
that, nationwide and nationally, law enforcement,
etc., training, or, at least, appropriate
training, isn't really a priority. The fact that
it was provided, even though, evidently, as an afterthought, should be
esteemed. ( What would be the impact on the
quality of our global position if politicians were
required to receive formal
specific-to-their-new-position-training in
management techniques, human relations,
international cultures, etc.?)
And,
yes, anyone in such a role would probably need
training in what is humane and what is not, as
well as what is right and what is wrong. The
reason for this is that the "unofficial"
(?) requirement for such positions, even if
temporary, seems to be that the incumbent
disengage his brain so he can't think on his own,
disengage his heart so he doesn't "care"
about .... what he's told to do, and to carry out
"duties" with the required level of
cowardliness
-
or else!
GOT
THAT?
"...
interrogation techniques used in Iraq had
violated the Geneva Conventions and said they
did not know who, if anyone, had approved the
use of those techniques.
Isn't
it ANYONE's job in U.S. government today to know
ANY of this stuff? Or is this just a part of the
built-in unaccountability of these positions? Is
this the same as local and state police behaving
as though they are unaware of federal laws?
albeit
"All
3,800 Iraqis at Abu Ghraib are “security
detainees,” said the commander, Maj. Gen.
Geoffrey Miller, or people suspected of roles in
insurgent attacks on coalition forces. No one is
a prisoner of war, Miller said.
"No. 2 general and civilian at the Pentagon...
were unaware of any U.S. military rules for
interrogating prisoners that would allow them to
be put in stressful positions, deprived of sleep
for up to 72 hours, threatened with dogs
What
are all of the horrors that David and the others
having to endure? What is being done to them? How
many hours on end is he and the others deprived of
sleep, when they are often required to work around
the clock? NO, drugging them in a way that keeps them able to perform services forced of them does not
count!
Under what conditions is David now being held,
when some of the conditions in the past were so
horrifying? What effect is all of these horrors
having on him and the rest of the victims? How
much longer is Dave and the others going to be
able to endure this?
or
kept in isolation for more than 30 days.
heively
kept me in relative isolation, or tried to, for 18
years. This gang started trying to keep David
isolated from other than the people with whom they
wanted him to interact, and me from Dave, as well
as anyone else who may try to associate with me,
since May 2002. David and I have been totally
isolated from one another since 5/13/04, and even
before that, the isolation was as close to total
as it could be. There is reason to believe that
Dave is now also isolated from his family, possibly
from just after the 07/14/03
- THE RETURN OF THE QUEEN BEE
incident. NO, those that the spg may
have had posing as members of Dave's family most
certainly don't count.
Where
is Dave now? How isolated is he now?
"..
abuses reflected in the photos went beyond
approved interrogation techniques.
What
are they doing to him? How
is he? What condition is he in?
"...
“I'm absolutely convinced we laid down the
foundations for how you detain people humanely,”
said Miller..."
How
can that be when we are allowing what is happening
to David, and other people who are not
"detainees" but victims of abduction, be
carried out so blatantly and so blatantly
protected by authorities? What foundation has been
laid out, for local authorities, of what is
acceptable and unacceptable when they may often
join with the perpetrators in carrying out these
horrors, if only some of the harassment?
“The
garbage that you keep reading — about cover-up
and the Pentagon doing something to keep some
information from people — is unfair,
inaccurate and wrong,” Rumsfeld said.
How
possible is it that, in the as-of-this-second
scenario, more effort is being taken to find out
how those photos leaked to the "wrong
people" than in establishing effective
measures to help ensure that such atrocities are
not even able to occur and/or there is a clear and
responsive avenue for reporting and correcting any
future abuse? How possible is it that those who
are found to have reported these abuses and/or
provide further information supporting their
existence are dealt with more harshly, even if in
a possibly clandestine way, than even the proven
perpetrators?
Who
is going to believe Rumsfeld when he says,
"Abuse will not happen again" when it
appears that all that authorities think is
required to convince others is to get a new pair
of boots and walk around with them on? And why
should we believe that "our government" is really
trying to fight U.S. slavery when it is flagrantly
acting as though it thinks that all that is
required to convince people is to appropriate
money for services for rescued victims, such as
counseling for victims of torture, when it is doing
absolutely nothing to try to rescue victims and so
much to support and protect slavery operations?
The
times they are a'changin' and the good people of the
world will stand as one in defending each other
and each other's rights. How possible is it for
what has been done to Dave and the many, many
other non U.S. nationals abducted, tortured,
enslaved and otherwise brutalized in this country
to become part of the international scandal that
may, in fact, be what it is going to take to help
bring about the needed changes?
And
what is the spg now thinking when they must
realize that, no, it is very, very unlikely that
what they are doing to Dave and the others will be
just dismissed by them saying things like,
"oh, that kind of thing is done around here
all the time!"? How are they feeling, if they
are capable of such function, when they are
learning of the public reaction to the atrocities
in Iraq that don't even come close to what is
being done here?
RETURN
TO TOP OF PAGE
RETURN
TO HOME PAGE
05/14/04 - The Grand Illusion a la International
:
even suggesting that what was done was as a form
of interrogation. Am I the only one who may have
missed one of the many, many quotes that should
have been publicized, of perpetrators, that would
have tied the abuse to this as the
motivation/justification?
Or
is the "interrogation" motivation merely
being cosmetically added as a white wash? Where
did that "interrogation explanation"
come in?
From
the newspapers? If so, did they create this
themselves and, if so, why? If not, who sent them
that? Though press releases? If so, the identity
of the who who submitted/is submitting such
articles would probably be valuable news, in
itself.
(watch
your drink)
RETURN
TO TOP OF PAGE
RETURN
TO HOME PAGE
05/15/04 - still so many unanswered questions
Possible
answers:
"these
are the people running out [our and
"running out" our] country":
GOLD
Coast Madam still pointing finger
Chicago
Tribune (subscription) - Chicago, IL, USA
<http://www.chicagotribune.com/features/lifestyle/chi-0405060048may06,1,4057479.story?coll=chi-leisuretempo-hed>
...
Laws ran a lucrative arm of the
"Circuit," an upscale prostitution
ring that
... year to a racketeering charge
stemming from the August 2002 federal raid,
Laws is ...
RETURN
TO TOP OF PAGE
RETURN
TO HOME PAGE
05/16/04 - Our Precious One - Us
Dave,
Because there are mountains to move, they will be
moved.
If
the sky has to fall, it will.
If
there is need for all of the stars to be shot out
of the sky, all of us in the entire world will be
reveling in the warmth and excitement of being
covered with glimmering stardust from shattered
stars, and we will all be elated to realize that
there are no more unreachable intermittent
phantoms of light above us.
My
life, regardless of what has come before, has been
permanently and correctly re-pivoted to you, the
so, so rightful center of my being.
I
now know why I was created. It was for you. You
are why I was meant to be.
Now
I only live for you. And I live for the moment we
are in each other's arms again, when we can hold
each other, touch and feel each other. Oh, so so
yes, when we can see each other in more than only
the "spiritual" way we constantly do
now.
David,
I miss you so much. I know that I don't have to
tell you how much I love you, but you also know
how important it is to me to say, "I love
you, Dave, with all of all that is me."
...Yes.
I know you know I know.
Love,
we've are holding each other extra close, each of
us knowing that the other part of us is doing the
same.
How
I long to kiss you!
Our
love is great enough to conquer this evil, to move
mountains, to cause the sky to fall, to cease the
existence of things the dimensions of which are
measured in mere light years.
We
- including those who know what we are because
they are, also - WE are the only real matter and
we shall conquer the evil forces of all universes.
And,
yes, Dave, if you are not already aware, probably
due to the isolation that has been forced upon
you, there are people who may use these public
expressions of my love for you to further exploit
you.
And
there are other extremely perverted people whose
desire to abuse you will be intensified in
reading/hearing what I've communicated here.
And,
hopefully, you know that that is why I sang,
"You've Got to Hide Your Love Away" so
many months ago.
RETURN
TO TOP OF PAGE
RETURN
TO HOME PAGE
05/17/04 - How to survive in today's world > gid thiet
cam'rah!!!!!
GidREeL! Yor
kid'z shipin oud ovah der! Yahno wadat meenz!
Ya bedda git
zum 'vdenze t'show incase she - or even if yor
he's been sent over - ends up in one of dem fotos
that shows yor kid smilin eddah cam'rah while she
grins and points to the private parts of ... one
ob dem guys... or meybe her predy white face and
blue eyes and blond hair standing - bright eye
smiling - in back of a peromid of da people she
supposedly went over there to help - yeah, you
knew she was over her head in debt because of ....
whatever. No, that wasn't it. It was something
else she got involved in.... what's that yesed?
..... oh, the'd y' can'd disgust?
Well, ya
know how many of us can relate to THAT!!!!!
So gid thiet
cam'rah owd. Git photos of her doing some really
patriotic things, like helping to plant tulip and
narcissis bulbs in front of the veteran's memorial
on the town green.
What?
Because what? Oh. The kid's only 2 years old.
We'll it's
never too early to start. Just buy her some really
kick ass type of boots and take pichers of her
walking around with them on.
Y'd be
amazed at how much milage a photo like that would
fetch!
What's that?
Oh, you already have a photo of her - sorry, him -
before this all started. Yeah, I can see it. I can
see why all of this other stuff is so important to
you.
RETURN
TO TOP OF PAGE
RETURN
TO HOME PAGE
05/22/04 - smoke on the water
What is it
that's going to finally trigger rescue of Dave and
the other victims?
It's not
likely that new appeals are able to be made, nor,
yet, that renewed appeals will be entertained. As
authorities are suddenly becoming more and more
finally, finally "aware" that, YES!!!!
there IS SOMETHING GOING ON HERE -
WHAT IS GOING TO BE THE KICK IN THE ASS THAT GETS
THEM TO FINALLY DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT????????
Yes, we the
people of the U.S., of whom the U.S. government
should rightfully be by and for, have embarked on
a much so critically needed overthrow of the
current U.S. government, i.e., an
overthrow/ousting of those who have subvertedly
infiltrated our government to the point that it's
actual features were no longer recognizable to
even those to whom it was so dear, with whom it
was so intimately and personally involved - the
American people themselves.
From even
the boonies, such as areas in which we here in SE
CT live, we are able to see that Dibble ("I
don't know anything about any of that and I don't
WANT to know anything about it!") is being
forced to resign, for example. CT governor Rowland
is in the process of being impeached. That scandal
is creating the impetus for federal investigation
and clean up of other state agencies, including
state police, DEP, DOT, etc., etc., etc. ( No, we
haven't heard all of it yet!) In turn, many other
undesirables will be pulled under by the riptide.
It probably
would not be surprising to most people who have
been following events to soon hear of impeachment
proceedings against Bush and the ousting of many
other federal and other political figures. It may
even be likely that we see a dismantling of
certain federal agencies that have deteriorated
beyond repair, such as possibly the U.S. DOJ,
including the FBI. (Many events point to the
unlikelyhood that such entities would otherwise be
able to achieve the needed cultural and other
changes quickly enough to enable our nation to
begin to regain itself.) There may even be some
major changes in the political process before the
next presidential election this fall - if only in
attempts to avert possible violent outbreaks
of and against the American people.
And most
likely the same shot will be heard 'round the
world, the same current running through our entire
precious global community.
How many
people of other countries are similarly
experiencing what has happened to many of us in
such a painful and horrifying manner that has led
to us now be speculating that perhaps our
government was not being run by whom we thought
was running it? Monday morning quarterbacking it,
it makes sense. Not going to look up more current
figures, but in 1990, 70% of the companies
operating in the U.S. were MOFA's, i.e., majority
owned foreign affiliates. That meant that they
were either just outright not a U.S. national
owned company or that the majority of its
ownership/its controlling ownership was not U.S.
national. Over the past decades, by the very
nature of that to which our political structure
has evolved, U.S. government is basically
controlled by "business." We just never
realized who those "businesses" really
may be, even as they so arrogantly, and even often
openly, controlled legislation through lobbying
efforts and their political puppets through
campaign contributions. Then add to that
indications of growing organized crime.
In our new
painfully acquired intelligence, perhaps many of
us will see each dollar spent toward a candidate's
campaign as each being an additional notch against
the qualifications of that person to responsibly
hold office. That what each of those dollars
possibly/probably represents is another
"obligation" against the integrity and
security of our nation. And what part may the
rampant abduction and slavery practices be playing
in all of this? Is there something of the missing
link in all of this, when there are so many major
questions going unanswered even as the U.S.
government is finally publicizing the seriousness
of this situation? (Although it still falls
considerably short of total much needed
disclosure, see the 05/20/04 article HUMAN
Smuggling a National Security Risk, US Official
Says, www.iwar.org.uk/news-archive/2004/05-20-3.htm)
Yes, as so
many politicians, such as Rowland, have offered as
a defense something along the lines that
"it's all about what it takes to achieve
office in U.S. government today." One of the
many emails currently in the queue is the one of
which the current wip (work in progress) version
is entitled Just WHO is really running
"our" country? that speaks of this
in much more detail.
[Slight
digression: It's been necessary to divert the
usual efforts away from current emails recently,
due to other things blaring their angry heads off.
Along these lines, as of the present time, the
reconstructed My Kindred Spirit web site has
partially been uploaded and the permanent web
site, mykindredspirit.home.att.net
may be down for a period. During this period, the
interim site can be found at
mykindredspirit2.home.att.net or
mykindredspirit3.home.att.net. Other pages still
need to be completed and uploaded: Deciphering,
Issues, Laws, How to Report, and Victims
("Data&Analysis" is in the process
of being removed.) Other than these pages, all
other pages should be accessible to those seeking
to visit the site. Right now, the borders of the
home page are not "working." In order to
navigate through the site, until this is
corrected, navigation can be made through one of
the other pages. This is one of the links that
should facilitate this: http://mykindredspirit2.home.att.net/AuthoritiesInEfforts.htm]
But back to
the overthrow of the current U.S. government, no,
it's not merely the "current
administration" that is being ousted/that
needs to be ousted. It is the whole culture that
has been allowed to ferment in such a large
percentage of the grains of our country's fiber.
Yes, ALLOWED! We realize the demise of our
government was due to our own carelessness, our
own apathy, our own arrogance in feeling that we
were being "patriotic" in not allowing
the dissension, criticism and debate so
constructive in maintaining the integrity and
strength of our nation. ( In how many other
communities of the U.S., let alone throughout the
world, are such conversations being forbidden in
local establishments?)
But, in the
meantime, what about David and the many, many
other victims we love so much, who are being held
and who are suffering horribly, continually,
within U.S. borders/at the hands of hardened
sociopaths that authorities are still protecting,
while all of this other stuff is just beginning to
take place?
It is
inhumane and a violation of human rights to allow
such beautiful people who are victims of U.S.
slavery, men, women and children, many of whom are
U.S. nationals, to continue to be subjected to the
conditions of their situation until all of these
other complexities are resolved, to continue to
suffer, etc., as we are just beginning what may
still be a very slow process to clean up our act.
Merely allocating effective resources for services
if a victim has the freedom to approach a service
provider, and/or after a victim is freed, does not
address the U.S. slavery problem and is a sham.
Slavery victims have to be rescued, need
assistance in getting freed, in order to be able
to benefit from the funds and resources that are
currently being allocated for their welfare. How
are all of those U.S. dollars that are being so
widely publicized as going to "efforts to
fight human trafficking" actually being
spent? Are there many pork barrels among the
"service providers" who are receiving
such generous government funding?
RETURN
TO TOP OF PAGE
RETURN
TO HOME PAGE
05/24/04 - David, more than forever
You
ask me how much I need you, must I explain?
I need you, oh my darling, like roses need
rain
You ask how long I'll love you, I'll tell you
true,
Until the Twelfth of Never, I'll still be loving
you
Hold
me close, never let me go
Hold me close, melt my heart like April snow
I'll
love you 'til the bluebells forget to bloom
I'll love you 'til the clover has lost its
perfume
I'll love you 'til the poets run out of
rhyme
Until the Twelfth of Never and that's a long, long
time
Until the Twelfth of Never and that's a long, long
time......
[TWELFTH
OF NEVER - Words & music by Livingstone -
Webster]
Yes,
Love. This has been running through my mind
throughout the last few days as I sensed you were
wondering, primarily due to technical
communication problems of which you may not yet be
aware.
I
love you so much, Dave. Think of how you feel and
know you have never any reason to doubt what I
feel and how much I care for you.
RETURN
TO TOP OF PAGE
RETURN
TO HOME PAGE
05/25/04 - mykindredspirit.home.att.net NOW mykindredspirit2.home.att.net
Please help
spread the word that the My Kindred Spirit web
site has moved:
mykindredspirit.home.att.net
is
NOW at
mykindredspirit2.home.att.net
All of the
previous pages are now working and additional
features/information pages have been added. Work
is continuing with the rest that is planned for
this time.
What is the
My Kindred Spirit web site?
The My
Kindred Spirit web site is devoted to facilitating
the rescue of specific locally abducted victims of
a U.S. modern day sex slavery operation working
out of SE CT, prosecution of the perpetrators, and
the urging and facilitating of U.S. government
investigation of the situation. It contains
illustrations of many of the schemes used by
traffickers to mask activities and prevent
investigation, and information useful in
deciphering victims and the "uncharacteristic
behavior" that may indicate the presence of
local terrorism by traffickers/organized crime in
a community. It also includes verifiable evidence
of coercion, condescension and/or corruption of
U.S. authorities in U.S. slavery related
atrocities and associated crimes. This information
may be valuable to other anti slavery advocates
throughout the U.S. and the rest of the world.
The My
Kindred Spirit web site is also the official web
site of the local "underground"
anti-slavery force, which is now officially
registered as the Southern New England Anti
Slavery Coalition (SNEASC).
The web site
is quite extensive, as it is one that is primarily
for local communications. It also contains some
harsh language. This is something quite common and
understandable in the responses of the loved ones
of victims. Those victims are men, women and
children, many of whom are U.S. nationals, who, in
the control of traffickers/slavers, are suffering
horrible and sadistic abuse, as authorities do
nothing to help the situation. The behavior of
authorities, instead, protects the perpetrators of
these heinous crimes.
The My
Kindred Spirit web site is referenced in a number
of publications, including:
RETURN
TO TOP OF PAGE
RETURN
TO HOME PAGE
05/28/04 - answer and questions
The answer
is no, I don't know what else to do that would
directly help Dave or any of the other local
victims. Every possible avenue I've been able to
identify, given the extremely few resources at my
disposal, has been pursued. Faces still turn away.
Eyes are still averted. Voices are still silent.
Hands still don't reach out. Many needed friends
still behave as though they don't know me.
Authorities still continue to prove dysfunctional
and/or act as though they are corrupt. Law
enforcement still don't enforce law. Appeals still
continue to be ignored. Pleas still continue to be
unanswered. Messages still continue to go
un-returned.
Emails
unread? Information not used? Intelligence
misguided? Truth twisted and manipulated? Lies and
grand delusions prevail. So many still seem to
prefer to be fooled by the illusions created by
sociopaths bent on destroying all that and who
they can, hurting all who and that they can,
controlling all who and that they can, exploiting
all that and who they can.
No action,
despite obvious awareness of such serious
atrocities and crimes. Lawlessness! Injustice!
Cruelty. Sadistic, sick cruelty!
How can
people be this cruel? How can people allow this
type of suffering when they can so easily end it,
if only by speaking out? If only be banding
together and taking action? If there are people
who feel that this is wrong, why aren't they
stepping forward? Why aren't they speaking out?
If there are
people in authority who are against what is
happening, why aren't they, at least, saying so?
If there are business people who are against what
is going on, why are they continuing to do so much
to support and protect those activities? Why are
so many people still trying so hard to behave as
though these atrocities are not taking place, when
they know that doing so only protects the
perpetrators and facilitates even greater and
additional harm to the victims, perhaps even
facilitates the taking of additional victims? How
can people behave this way?
Why aren't
the people who have information needed to end this
doing something with that information?
Why are
people acting so stupid? Why aren't they acting as
though they realize that the good way more
outnumber the bad? Why are they being so stupid as
to let themselves be so controlled by despicable
scum, even as they see more and more horror taking
place? Instead of, in shock, just saying, as they
are being ordered around by sleaze, as they are
realizing that they are losing more and more of
their rights and freedom to the sleaze whose
actions they find loathsome, "I can't believe
this is really happening" why aren't people
doing something about it? Why aren't they
resisting? Why aren't they fighting back?
When they
are seeing ground being lost so rapidly, why are
people being so slow to respond?
Why does it
seem that so many people are unable to think
through the implications of all of this? Why do
they not seem to see the danger to themselves, as
well as to Dave and other victims, as well as to
me and to other loved ones of victims?
How is it
that they seem to not be able to find it in their
heart to care about any of this?
Why is it
that they are so cowardly that they will allow
their community and their destiny to be so
adversely impacted by a band of sleazy hoods?
Where are
the principles people like to talk so much about?
Why is it that we denounce other countries for
doing things that we are allowing to go
unchallenged in our own country?
Where is our
pride? Where are our morals? Where is our common
sense?
Where is our
desire to keep our country free? Where is our
fight for freedom and for our rights?
Why are so
much of our efforts and resources misplaced in
defending freedom and the "American way"
for others while we ignore our own? Why does it
seem that they are all so misplaced? How are the
funds and resources supposedly appropriated for
such things actually being used?
What is our
motivation is all of this? Or are we just
non-existent? Don't we matter to ourselves? Are we
to be expected to sacrifice so much for freedom
and justice in other countries yet disregard the
loss of freedom and justice in our own country?
How and why
have we become such a backward country?
RETURN
TO TOP OF PAGE
RETURN
TO HOME PAGE
05/29/04 - draziw > take?
REALLY
think rather than doing what the sleaze know
you've been programmed to do!
FIND it in
you heart - yes, it's really there - to care!
HAVE THE
COURAGE TO ACT!!!!!!!!
males not
considered children are the most lucrative
commodity:
-
no
one is "targeting" them as victims -
speaking only of the good guys, of course. In
fact, "publicizing" is just now
starting to recognize that males may also be
victims of trafficking, but just talking about
"boys" and usually under 10 years of
age, although there may have been one or more
mentioned of "boys" up to 14 years
old.
-
'course,
this only pertains to more developed nations.
So that means it does not include the
U.S..
-
and
the trafficking of men/even "boys"
is also more lucrative because they may be
marketed in a number of more markets, in
addition to labor in the other than sex
trade:
- heterosexual
women
- gay
men
- those,
regardless of gender, who really aren't
sure
- sadists,
regardless of gender
- those,
regardless of gender, desiring to
"dominate" those older than
themselves, and/or the
"dominant" sex and or whatever
their perverted mind may be perceiving as
. . . .
- those,
regardless of gender, who just like to be
cruel
- those,
regardless of gender, looking to do
something that will make a far out/gory
story to tell
- those,
regardless of gender, who just feel that
their life has been just too ho hum
- those,
regardless of gender, who want to do
something that may make their
father/spouse/peers/[who the flip knows
when the person is this warped?]
"respect" them
- etc.,
etc., etc., regardless of gender
Yes! This
whole fliping industry thrives on pervertedness!
What is
going on still has to be stopped! Focus on this
> all of this that we are up against should
only serve to help define where the battles may
take place. It should not stifle us from engaging
in battle!
Where is
that FLIPING ARMY I heard about so long
ago?????????????
RETURN
TO TOP OF PAGE
RETURN
TO HOME PAGE
NOTE:
THIS DOES NOT NECESSARILY INCLUDE ALL THE EMAILS
SENT OUT DURING THIS PERIOD
Click
to go to the next group of emails on this site
Click
to go to the previous group of emails on this site
|